I'll be honest, DH and I both hated school. As children and adults. Therefor we are considering alternative schools for LO. We are not antischool or "unschoolers" - we want LO to have an education, but just have doubts that traditional public schools are for everyone. I think they work well for some kids, but not all.
We were considering Waldorf, but I'm definitely going to do some more research after reading the posts below. We are also considering Montessori through 8th grade. Does anyone have experience, good or bad, with Montessori for grade school?
Like I said, we are still in the research phase; and we are interested in hearing a variety of viewpoints.
Re: s/o waldorf, what about montessori?
I like everything you have described except "there really isn't much imaginative play. The activities should be done the way they should be done (i.e. you can't use the puzzle pieces and turn them into figurines for free play)."
Hmm.... I will look into Reggio-Emilia, but I doubt there is anything around where I will be living. Our choices are Waldorf, Montessori and other private-but-geared-toward-strict-academics schools. We are looking for something that structures the kids into blocks of age groups as opposed to single grades and is focused on experiential learning. We also want to some sort of foreign language at an early age.
Thanks for the response!
I want to build a bit on Fred's last comment.
Ari started Montessori in January. I knew it was right for him, partly because he is very exact & orderly in his activities, but I was slightly concerned about the creativity aspect. Ari spends most of his time pretending to be various animals, a rock star, a construction vehicle, etc. He's very into pretend & make believe.
I toured 2 schools. The first was more relaxed, had outside time incorporated into the day (both free play & the children are allowed to work on the small, gated pation attached to the building), and has time set aside for music, art & gym. The second was really, really rigid & cold. Even though the first school is a 30 min drive & the second only 10 mins, I chose the first. It may be less "strictly Montessori" than the other school, but Ari is thriving there & it still has the Montessori aspects I was looking for.
Also, I think that since many of the works & materials are self correcting & the child has to figure out how to do it right on their own to a certain extent, that actually fosters creativity & problem solving skills more than worksheets & drills.
We did montesorri with SD until she got to Kindergarted and we moved, there wasn't one in our area. I would strongly reccomend it especially if you are going to keep him there until 8th grade.
Switching her at Kindergarten was a nightmare, we had a horrible time teaching her that she couldn't pick her own activity anymore.
Now our school had a 2.5 hour session in the mid morning and a 1.5 hour session in the afternoon, but they had a half hour of just creative play, where they used paint playdough, sand and water, anything, they just had to have something to show for the end of the half hour.
I loved it Katelyn did too. I would reccomend a two day trial, to see how he does with the structure and teacher in the class.
You are the only experience I have ever read where a Waldorf educated child assimilated into a public school setting and was advanced academically and socially.
My DH went to a Montessori school through 6th grade and I really think it benefited him, overall. He has the ability to hyper focus on a project or study for hours on end that I've never seen in anyone else. It makes him a very efficient worker and problem-solver and he is very valued by his employers.
I do have to say, though, that they did him a great disservice when it comes to standardized testing. He's super intelligent (graduated at the top of his class in a top 25 business school), but he can't take standardized tests (like GMAT, SAT, etc) for sh*t and it really hampered his attempts to get into, say, top 5 schools. I do think the benefits outweigh the downsides, but it still bothers him that he couldn't get into those schools because of his test scores and it's hard to replace that "not good enough" feeling, KWIM?
Atticus also goes to a Montessori school. At first I wasn't too keen on the idea of not really fostering creativity, but then I realized a few things:
A) all kids are creative! It's a great skill to be able to put your creativity in your pocket for a while and use it other times. In other words, creativity and imagination are what he is able to do a home, the playground, play dates, etc. Focusing on a task and doing it the correct way is what you do at school. This can translate to adult life, too. Sometimes you have a job where you are to complete a task a certain way. You aren't supposed to do it your way, KWIM?
I guess what I'm trying to get at is that there can be a balance. Unless, of course, you run your household using the Montessori model as well.
hmph. I will have to see what the one we are thinking of is like. LO seems to be very creative so far - as were her DH and I when we were her age.
This is all compounded by the fact that we are actually going to move to the area where the school is. We are looking at about 3 schools, all in different states.
Thank you all for your insight! It is fascinating and useful.
It's so nice hearing positive Waldorf stories. I'm always hearing and reading negative stories including those of my both my cousins.
I think Montessori can be awesome, but DD would not thrive in a Montessori setting due to her almost excessive creativity. Seriously, the kid doesn't accept limitations or boundaries on what things are intended to do/be. It expands way beyond that, but she's is always creating new things- stories, plays, letters and toys out of tin foil....