So...I should start by saying that we haven't moved yet. But...we are seriously looking at moving to a even higher cost of living area within a HCOL area where daycare for 2 kids will exceed $55,000/year (1 infant, 1 toddler). This is for pretty much every daycare center within the community of 80,000 people. In home daycares are generally $9/hour x 50 hours/week x 2 x 52 = about $47,000, so not really that much better.
What would you do? These are the ideas that I can come up with:
- Delay moving (we live in a 2 bedroom apt., so things are getting really tight) to save $20K in daycare costs.
- Suck it up and pay since it's temporary. We could probably swing it but would have to make cuts elsewhere and/or buy a smaller house. I feel opposed to this just because daycare should NOT cost more than college tuition. No, it does not 'pay' for me to work, but I like to work and we would not lose money from my career hobby (as my husband has occasionally referred to it).
- Buy a house only near the edge of town where we can easily drop the kiddos off at a daycare in a less expensive area, saving us about 20K/year for a daycare 2 miles away. We've been looking for a house for 1.5 years so further restricting our search isn't really that helpful towards our actually buying a house soon but we could keep looking at least a few months longer.
- Buy a house wherever in town that we find it and, if we need to, hire someone to drop off both kiddos at a less expensive daycare each morning (or do pickups). I kind of like this option, in my dream world, they help get the kids out the door, pack lunches, maybe put the dishes in the dishwasher from the night before and take them to daycare which could make mornings a lot less crazy. I don't know how much this would cost...would you miss watching your kids be dropped off every day? I still think this would save 10-15K.
- Hire a nanny/au pair for the infant and let the toddler do one of those preschools where full time is 9-12 to get some socialization/structure. Daycare (in my current, less expensive town) has worked out so well for DD that I'm not sure I love this option either. And I don't know if it would really be less expensive.
Thoughts? Ideas? I definitely have some sticker shock.
Re: The $55,000 daycare dilemma (long)
This is what I would do. At least your nanny could help you out with some things around the house and you wouldn't have to worry about drop off and pick up cutting into your day. This might not be an option in your area, but we have a lot of co-op preschools where a parent has to be in the classroom to volunteer one day a week, but most of them allow you to bring a sibling infant. The nanny could potentially do that for you and bring your infant on that day. Co-ops are about 1/4 - 1/3 the price of regular preschool and they seem to have great kids because it's all kids whose parents want to be very involved. I think its a great option for socialization and education for kids with SAHMs or nannys. Just an idea to add to the list!
I'd consider sucking up the 2 bedroom a little longer. 20k a year is a LOT, think of how much that would be in a college fund 17 years from now? I'd delay moving until either one or both kids were old enough for public school.
If not, I'd go with the nanny idea. The nanny could be a good mix of your last two options--help get the older one ready and drive him over to DC in a cheaper area and help then spend the day with the infant. Not sure this would really be cheaper though since you'd be paying a nanny and still for DC.
I'm in metrowest Boston, but on the edge of it (so more west of Boston than I'm sure you are). Yes, this is a pretty high cost area, and I'm in the cheap part! We just switched DS1 to a preschool/center from an in home daycare since he was ready for that environment. We love it and are so happy with our decision, but the cost is so much for just 2 days!
We are currently in a 2 bedroom condo with the two boys, and it's honestly not that bad. Yes, we would ideally love to get a house with a bit more space, but we would lose money if we were to sell right now. Plus, I love not having to worry about all of the maintenance and work that would come with a house. I would say to stick with where you are for now. There are some perks to living in a smaller space. We definitely do spend more time together as a family and it forces us to live much more simply and not buy tons of crap. Plus, if you have the ability to pay 20K more per year for daycare, I say stay where it's cheaper for a year or two and save that!
I'd do nanny plus preschool too. Think about once the toddler hits school and how convienient it will still be!
Then you also get your partial dreak of someone to do dishes, pack lunches, etc.
This is our plan once we have a 3rd. We can't afford another kid in daycare (right now we pay more than a nanny would get). Then the nanny comes to the house and gets the girls ready for school, packs lunches, drives them back and forth, takes care of the baby, does laundry and light housework, etc.
How do you recommend finding an au pair or nanny? We are spending $32K per year, plus summer fees now for a DC center. Our kids are well-cared for, but it is a financial burden.
Then again, though, these providers have been part of our "family" for 3.5 years. How do you trust a single person with your 3 kids, after having had a good DC experience?
Thanks for all the suggestions. It sounds like there is a consensus that we should do a combination of something. It's good to hear that people have had a good experience with au pairs...there are so many horror stories floating around the internet of young women disappearing in the middle of the night. I'll ask more question about hiring an au pair when/if the time comes.
I hear what people are saying about staying put for another year BUT:
1) I wanted to buy a home 4 years ago, so I feel like we've been waiting plenty long.
2) I want to have 3 kids so this problem is just going to resurface again (not that it wouldn't solve it for the short term).
3) I worry about DD's current daycare after she's done the toddler program. It gets to be 26 kids in a room (with 4 providers). I know the ratio is OK but 26 3 year olds in 1 room does not sound ideal to me.
4) I actually think staying put and continuing to rent is risky too...bear with me. The government is going to have to inflate away our massive debt eventually...this will cause inflation in other sectors and raise interest rates. So, we'd have the triple whammy of the money we've already saved being worth less, higher home prices and higher interest rates (and higher rents). Locking in a home and mortgage now makes a lot of sense to me...not that this is going to happen in the next year, but as the economy picks up, I think it is inevitable. (I'm not in finance, just my opinion.)
Mostly...I don't really want to stay put...we have no parking and during the winter often have to park over a block away. I can't imagine carrying a 6 month old and a 3 year old when there is a foot of snow on the ground next winter. I was worried about doing it pregnant with a 2 year old, but luckily, there has been very little snow.
Thanks again everyone!
It's really a personal preference. I like that I don't have to get my kids up early in the morning and out the door. I also feel that they are "safer" in my home than anywhere else. I know what is in my house, and that we have a safe playroom for them to be in.
Interviewing an au pair is the same as a nanny, you can't meet them in person, but with Skype you can talk "face to face" and gauge their reactions to your questions. Its a lot of work to find a good one, but once you have, they (or at least mine) have been able to help me find their replacement when the time comes for them to go home.
Some people don't like having someone else live in their house. I don't have a problem with it, and my au pairs have been very respectful of our house rules, but it is something to consider.
The only downside I have is finding a replacement every 1-2 years. I love my current au pair and wish that he could stay more than 2 years. My boss on the other hand likes having a new person every year (he has a child with special needs though, and I think that takes a toll (on anyone) after awhile).
I don't think DC's are horrible, it just doesn't work for us (and I'm not talking about financially). I will say that we LOVE our children's preschool (they go PT 3 mornings per week) but if I had to choose DC or au pair (money not being an object) I would choose an au pair hands down.
I live south of Boston, so I am familiar with the prices. I would try to stick it out where you are, cut your budget as much as possible to save as much of the 20k you can, and then buy in the area you really want. It is temporary, but think of how much 20k could do with compounded interest by the time your kiddos are in college...
We'll miss you sweet Debbie Girl (4.21.12) and sweet Cindy Girl (8.9.12)

I would do the option where you hire someone to take the kids to/from daycare. We do that and it has worked out fabulously! Daycare is cheaper for us than a nanny (even for two kids because my firm subsidizes it) and my daughters learn a lot more at their daycare than my friends' children do at the local preschools.
We hired someone to pick the girls up, take them home, start dinner and then when I get home (my husband is a consultant and OOT Mon-Thurs every week), I get to play with the girls and spend two hours of quality time with them while our helper does the dishes, cleans bottles, helps with bath time, takes out hte trash, gets things packed for the next day. It has been a huge help and we were able to find someone at a reasonable price on care.com.
This is brilliant! It's like you (the wife) have a wife! Not being a smart-aleck at all. It gives you the time with your kids, rather than doing "household" stuff. What an awesome solution you have!