All I hear about these days is the Bradley method. Whatever happened to Lamaze?
I'm mainly curious because my mom is going to act as a doula for me (she is a retired L&D nurse) and has a good understanding of Lamaze but doesn't have a lot of experience with the Bradley Method. Does anybody still use Lamaze?
Re: Whatever happened to Lamaze?
Interesting.
Lamaze is totally not like this anymore. We are taking a Lamaze-based childbirth class and our doulas (who are also the childbirth teachers) are trained in Lamaze and they even told us that those breathing techniques are really outdated and no one uses them anymore.
Most of our classes have been about these 6 birth practices. We did a couple breathing exercises but they were all deep breathing. Nothing like the short rapid breaths that most people associate with Lamaze.
I took Lamaze. I agree that it's changed over the years and has become a bit more like Bradley. The cynical part of me says various laboring "techniques" come into and out of vogue just like parenting practices. In 10 years from now, no one will be doing Bradley and everyone will be doing something else.
Anyway. What I found most helpful was learning about various laboring positions and pressure points to relieve pain. Many of the positions were similar to what I was learning in prenatal yoga and I used the two together. I just tuned out everything hokey; DH and I still laugh about the ridiculous "focal object" I chose (I'm not even sure that it made it with us to the birthing center.)
I'm a FTM taking Bradley, so obviously I've never taken Lamaze, but I what I read about both indicated to me that the two most significant differences is Bradley is very pro-intervention-free while Lamaze is kind of nuetral to interventions and Bradley teaches to accept and work with the pain while Lamaze uses distraction techniques for pain management.
Again, just what I've read. Please correct me if I'm wrong.
I also read this in the book Natural Childbirth the Bradley Way. (Love that book!) I don't completely agree with this statement though. I definitely wouldn't say that Lamaze is neutral to interventions. In the class I am taking there is definitely a slant towards having an unmedicated birth although the instructors would never judge any woman who wants pain medication. And they talk all the time about how it's best to avoid interventions unless they are absolutely necessary. Most if not all of the couples in my class are planning an unmedicated birth.
I read the latest Lamaze book and really liked it. It very much jived with all the other reading I did, and was very pro-natural birth.
The hee-hee-hoo breathing is not part of the philosophy any longer.
I would guess a lot of the Bradley popularity vs. Lamaze is marketing, not any real advantage one way or the other. Bradley classes cost a lot... someone is making money.
Natural Birth Board FAQs
Cloth Diaper Review Sheet