I had a C-Section in May 2011 due to pre-eclampsia at 38.5 weeks gestation. I was a zero on the Bishop scale and my OB recommended a C-Section based on all of the factors available. I realize I could have tried to be induced but I agreed that I didn't want to have a medicated induction, be in labor for 24 hours and then end up on the operating room table anyway especially since they were really worried about my health. This was a very hard decision for me as I really wanted a completely non-medicated, natural child birth experience. We even took 12 weeks of Bradley classes.
When I made the decision to move forward with the C-Section I thought I only wanted two children and I didn't know about the risks associated with multiple C-Sections. Fast forward to now, I realize we may not be done at just two. I plan on having a serious discussion with my provider about the possibility of having a VBAC, but if that doesn't work out (for whatever reason) when does it become unsafe to continue to have C-Sections? Three children? Four?
I would be so disappointed if I couldn't have the number of children I wanted to (biologically) because of that first stupid C-Section. I often wonder what would have happened if I agreed to the induction instead. But there's not going back now.
Re: 3+ C-sections?
I've had 3 c/s.
1st - no complications
2nd - no complications
3rd - Massive complications, much longer surgery, ended up w/ MRSA infection, readmitted to hospital for 10 day stay and additional surgery to excavate the infection. I've heard of lots of people having normal no complication c/s
On the charts I've seen c/s 1 and c/s 2 seem to have minimal complications, #3 starts to jump up, and #4 is even higher, while #5 and up start to have really big complications.
We will stop at 3 even though I would like to have another attempt at having a girl.
They arrived at 36 weeks after PTL and bedrest for 14 weeks.
My OB was totally fine with me having a 3rd. I'm not too concerned about it. From what I've read/heard, #4 is when most doctors start to get a little more concerned. We have no desire to have more than 3 kids.
That's really good info. Thanks!
(read it. you know you want to.)
anderson . september 2008
vivian . february 2010
mabel . august 2012
Its more to do with the person than the number
It has to do with scar tissue, tone of the uterus, previous history, etc.
I know of a woman who has had 11 c-sections (16 births all together)
This will be my 3rd and no one has batted and eyelash.
We're not done, if everything looks good I'm planning on 6 kids and at this point I have no choice they'll all be c-sections.
BFP #2 11/30/09 EDD 08/12/10- Sophia Grace born 8/1/10
BFP #3 11/16/10 EDD 08/04/11- Samuel Richard born 7/28/11
BFP #4 01/04/12 EDD 09/19/12- Simon Nathaniel born 9/6/12
BFP #5 03/27/13 EDD 11/25/13- Savannah Lee born 11/18/13