I'm wondering if we should take landon to see a physiatrist. I'm feeling very frustrated with our neuro. I asked her if we should see one and her comment was something like, "he already gets PT so there is no point in seeing a physiatrist"......I feel like since Landon has a diagnosis that our neuro cares very little about doing everything she can to help him. I don't even know how to put it into words but the last time we saw her she just seemed very judgemental of the different therapies that we do for Landon (nothing that would hurt him). As much as I love Kennedy kreiger/Hopkins I've heard so many negative stories about the neuros there. Landon has hypotonia and she didn't even tell us that Hopkins has a world renewed hypotonia clinic. I feel like she only sees him as a neurodegenerative condition and why bother doing anything more than the bare minimum. Wow, I just realized that this post totally strayed from my original question....... So if you were me would you add a physiatrist to the team?
Re: Ped. Physiatrist question
We see one, and I do think it could be beneficial. I agree that some neuros just don't seem to get the hypotonia thing. Our physiatrist monitors his tone and strength and write prescriptions for the equipment DS needs (AFOs, etc.) We see him maybe 3 times a year.
We have seen more than our share of neuros, and now we see an epileptologist, a metabolic/genetic neuro, and a local peds neuro who monitors progress and checks blood levels for his Keppra. It seems to be a good solution for us.
I'd go with what your gut is telling you.
Our physiatrist, Katharine Alter, works out of Mt. Washington by Hopkins and is fantastic. I'm not sure she takes new patients right now (we got in to see her through an NIH protocol) but her whole group is very good. https://www.mwph.org/services/rehabilitation/physiatry.htm
They are very different from PT as they focus on movement disorders (including the physiology, neurology, and genetics of them). They also are good "big picture" docs in that they recognize the importance of PT and other therapy and can help guide you with therapy/equipment that will make a difference. The only really beneficial thing our neuro has been able to say is that we aren't dealing with seizures (at one point we weren't sure) and that he has lower muscle tone. Other than that, I haven't been thrilled with neurologists.
Our PT actually warned us about that. She mentioned if we had seen a physiatrist for DS's hypertonia and we said "no, noone has mentioned it". So we followed her advice and set up an appointment. She warned us that it was our decision to discuss it with our neurologist because she said unfortunately they don't tend to see the value in it and can be offended by choosing to go to one.
Our neuro's were very blase about it. Basically he said "I doubt it will help but go ahead see what he says".
I LOVE our physiatrist. He has helped so much. He's puhed for our AFO's, got our gait trainer, knee immobilizers, and helped us with Botox. In fact, he such a valuable member of our team I sent him an e-mail with a picture of DS actually sitting up and he wrote back that he was so excited that the Botox helped and it made his day. Becasue of DS's rare genetic mutation he actually seems to always remember us and he knows our PT so it's great to have someone who really seems to care on a personal level about our son and about his OVERALL physical success. I found our neuro's are mostly concerned about his neurological success. They told us to push therapy but they don't discuss specifics with us and HOW to work on skills. They are overly pushy about doing MRI's and while they examine his tone and reflexes when asked how to manage them the best they don't really have much input. They've been very skeptical of Baclofen and botox.