And her mother's right there protesting with her!
Gist of the story: Girl poses in skimpy outfit (midriff bare, shoulders exposed, sexy face/pose). Student editors of yearbook decide not to public her photo. Administration backs them up citing dress code violation. Girl, her mother, and friends protest outside school. Student editors say she can use the picture in her senior ad, just not her senior portrait because they don't want to seem unprofessional and essentially ruin the integrity of their yearbook.
What say you all? Are they trampling on her freedom of expression or are the student editors right for putting their foot down?
For me, personally, no teenage daughter of mine would be posing like that for high school yearbook photos...and the last thing I'd be doing protesting in front of the school.
Re: CO Student banned from yearbook
This right here.
Unable to even.
********************
You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK. Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.
Unable to even.
********************
You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK. Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.
Sooo, she wants this photo to be her senior portrait? I thought senior portraits were those boring head shots of each student near the front of the year book. At least that's the way it was when I was in high school. Anything else could go on your senior ad. Just like what this yearbook staff is allowing. I guess I'm not understanding this girl's issue.
The Nest/Bump sucks and won't let me change my location. I'm in Arkansas, not Florida.
This.
First of all - why can't I find the actual picture!? It's driving me crazy! Lol! I want to see the slutty pic! Lol!
As a former yearbook editor in hs and college and a former hs yearbook advisor - they have every right not to publish the photo! At the school I worked at, dress code had to be followed in the senior pics. We were a little more lenient when it came to the senior ads. We had a baby pic section and I wouldn't allow a senior to put a picture of her as a little girl reading a book on the toliet...just not tasteful IMHO. I mean, for a baby book, it's very cute...just not a yearbook. And it was supposed to be a baby photo...not a 3 or 4 year old photo, which it was.
This exactly.
I think they are being overly nice by saying she can use the pic in her senior ad. However, the students pay to have "senior ads" so they have a little more freedom in what kind of pic they can use. Essentially, what they're saying is "We won't let you use this slutty picture of yourself in the senior portrait section, but if you want to pay us $50, you can put it in your own special slutty ad."
This makes me glad that at the HS I work at, they have pretty strict guidelines about what type of pic you can submit for the yearbook (indoor, black background, pretty much just a face shot - I don't know all the rules, but it's pretty straightforward and basic) If you don't submit a pic, I think they use your school photo. Maybe it "cramps their style" but at least no one ends up looking like a ho-bag.
Good for the school for standing up to this. They aren't trampling her freedom of expression. They aren't saying "you can't dress like this," they are saying "you can't dress like this AT SCHOOL and be in the yearbook." I can't believe the mom is supporting her. What kind of a parent would do such a thing.
Yes, that and she should also be dressing appropriately.
When we picked photo for senior yearbook, it had to be a head shot/shoulder and up type thing.
She shouldn't use that photo in yearbook
Exactly.
1. Scarf =/= shirt
2. She will forever be known as "That trashy girl who got banned from her yearbook".
Life with Blog