Toddlers: 12 - 24 Months

Induced against your will?

My sister was is due next week and hoping to go into labor naturally.  Her doctor told her several weeks ago she would like to induce to avoid a Christmas delivery because she didn't want to work on Christmas. 

At her 37 week appointment doctor said, this baby is big, we should schedule induction. My sister asked for a sono, which gauged baby at 6 lbs.  

This week when she went in her blood pressure was up a little.  Doctor said, let's induce, you have high blood pressure. My sister asked them to check again, it was back in the normal range.  Doctor sent her for a non-stress test, all came out well. 

She has called in every day with her BP, all normal, but doctor still said she felt like induction was necessary Monday.  Does anyone have any thoughts or experiences to share? 

Re: Induced against your will?

  • No experience, but that is ridiculous. Not wanting to work on Christmas is not a good reason to induce. I'd be pretty pissed, and I definitely would not agree to it. 
  • Loading the player...
  • She should just say no.  If worse comes to worse the on call doctor will deliver her baby. 

     Lilypie - (gu1R)
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers


  • they can't force her to do anything. if everything looks fine & there is no reason to induce all she has to say is, "no."
  • One would hope a doctor would do what is medically correct/needed for their patient and not be just making that decision due to not wanting to "work" on Christmas.

    So in my opinion if the doctor says you should induce you should induce.

  • They can't force you to be induced. If I was your sister I'd take a stand. How many weeks is she? Does she know the sex of the baby? Google "Wimpy White Boy Syndrom" That shiit. is no joke.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • It is well within her rights as a patient to refuse an early induction.  It sounds like her doctor is pushing for her own reasons, but if it's making your sister concerned about the baby she can ask for BPPs and NSTs to check on baby while letting the pregnancy continue.  If there weren't any good medical reasons to induce, I would just let baby come on it's own and deliver with whoever is on-call.  The doctor really only comes in at the very end anyway.
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic

    med-free birth x2, breastfeeding, baby wearing SAHM
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
    My BFP Chart

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageLibby1978:

    She should just say no.  If worse comes to worse the on call doctor will deliver her baby. 

    This, and truth be told, I didn't care who was between my legs when I was pushing DD out.  Could have been the janitor for all I cared.

    Image and video hosting by TinyPicImage and video hosting by TinyPic
    Eleanor Noelle - 18/05/12 Claire Elisabeth - 16/-5/10
  • First paragraph = red flag

    Second paragraph = doctor trying to find an excuse to scare the sh!t ot of your sister.  And, for the record, a "big baby" is not a good reason to induce or to schedule a c-section.

    Her doctor is being lazy and selfish.  Your sister is one patient.  Even if she doesn't go into labor on Christmas, some other woman will.

    If everything is normal, then let her go into labor NORMALLY.

    Lilypie Third Birthday tickers
    Lilypie First Birthday tickers
    Image and video hosting by TinyPic Image and video hosting by TinyPic
  • I have had similar experiences.  Both my babies are December babies - both within 12 days of Christmas.  With DD my OB was constantly bringing up scheduling my c-section (starting in my early 2nd trimester).  I asked why I needed a c-section because I wanted a natural birth she told me it was because I was high risk.  That was the first time I had ever been told I was high risk so I asked her why I classified as high risk.  She tried to skirt the question, but it turned out "it was a mistake in the records."  Guess what!  The next appointment I had "high BP" = high risk.  My BP was never high again after that, but I was thereafter classified as pre-eclamptic.  I ended up getting the natural birth I wanted just because DD decided to arrive at 35 weeks. 

    I ended up changing OBs with DS and even the new OB brought up inducing so that I would not have to be in the hospital over Christmas.  When I told her that did not bother me, she did not push it after that point but she did make a few comments about hoping baby would hurry.  Bottom line - they cannot force you to do anything you don't want!  Make sure you stand up for yourself and you can always get a second opinion if you don't think they are right.  I wish I would have gotten a second opinion or switched OBs completely when I was pregnant with DD because I am almost certain I did not have pre-e.      

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageBelleIsa:
    imageLibby1978:

    She should just say no.  If worse comes to worse the on call doctor will deliver her baby. 

    This, and truth be told, I didn't care who was between my legs when I was pushing DD out.  Could have been the janitor for all I cared.

    Yes, the baby catcher has the easiest job if you ask me.  The nurses do the rest.

     Lilypie - (gu1R)
    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers


  • This is one of the most insane things I have heard. I would be flipping out if this close to delivery my doctor was acting like that!!! 
    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • imageJake's Mom:

    One would hope a doctor would do what is medically correct/needed for their patient and not be just making that decision due to not wanting to "work" on Christmas.

    So in my opinion if the doctor says you should induce you should induce.

    Nope. My friend's sister was due two weeks after me, but her doc was okay with inducing her at 38 weeks because he was going to be on vacation, and she and her mother preferred being induced because they only wanted this doc delivering her baby, not one of the others in the practice. She went into natural labor two weeks before her scheduled induction.

    "We like nothing better than buffing our Zygoma. And imagining a horny time traveling long overcoat purple scarf wearing super sleuth nordic legend fuck fantasy. Get to work on that, internet." Benedict Cumberbatch

    image

     GIFSoup 

    <a href

  • Wow that's crazy!!! Our hospital has a strict policy on who and when someone can be induced.

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • FWIW, inductions on an unfavorable cervix have VERY high rate of ending in c/s. You didn't say if your sister had made any "progress", but something to consider. I think unnecessary inductions are crap! I had one for "medical" reasons that could have been controlled by other means. BTW it ended in a c/s.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I for the most part was induced at 38 weeks because several hours after my water breaking I didn't get regular contractions on my own. It really wasn't that bad. My water broke at 11:00am on Friday, January 29th, 2010 and Pitocin was started that evening. DD was born at 1:45 pm on Saturday, January 30th, 2010 after 27 hours of labor. Just wanted to share my induction story with you. GL to your sister!
  • My water broke with no contrax and I was "augmented" with pitocin. I had a great delivery. However, I would NOT induce without a medical reason. Her dr is in the wrong business. This is why I went with a practice with 7 doctors. Whoever is on call delivers, and someone is always working! My primary dr was on the day I delivered, which was nice, but it would have been fine regardless.
  • She needs to find a new doctor. And just stay home, even if her Dr schedules her for an induction. Hope she's left alone!
    DS1 - Feb 2008

    DS2 - Oct 2010 (my VBAC baby!)

  • I would be very wary of this doc.  If the tests say she's fine then I wouldn't agree to an induction just because the doc was pushing it.  But FWIW, I was scheduled for a c-section at 28 weeks (not to have the section then but just that it was put on the books) because G was breech and "big."  I thought it was way too early to be talking c-sections and lo and behold, she flipped and her growth leveled off and she was born naturally at 39 weeks.  Sometimes doctors get overly excited to medically intervene.


    Lilypie Kids Birthday tickers

    Lilypie Second Birthday tickers

    Lilypie Maternity tickers

    Always Sunny's back b-tches!

    image

  • imageRandiDeeAnn:
    FWIW, inductions on an unfavorable cervix have VERY high rate of ending in c/s. You didn't say if your sister had made any "progress", but something to consider. I think unnecessary inductions are crap! I had one for "medical" reasons that could have been controlled by other means. BTW it ended in a c/s.

    This. I was induced at 38 weeks for medical reasons (pre-e and out of control blood pressure) and I had not made any progression on my own naturally. Needless to say I had to have a c/s. Had I been in the situation of the OP's sister my decision would be to have the on-call doctor deliver the baby and tell the original OB to bugger off. 

  • Um... I would have been looking for a new doctor once she started finding excuses to induce. I know that you can't most of the time because it's too late in the game, but you DO NOT have to be induced if you don't want to, as long as there are no major health concerns or problems. My daughter was due around Christmas last year and my OB did the same thing. Just have her tell him that she will be refusing induction unless the doctor gives her legit evidence that there are issues to do it. If not, why pay her or trust her to deliver your child?
  • She showed her hand when she said she didn't want to work on Christmas, so now everything is suspect anyway. Is there another doctor in the practice?

    That is ridiculous.  Say no, and she can deal with the on call doctor.

    imageimage

    imageimage

    image  image

This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"