I'm just trying to learn as much as I can right now about getting a c-section. My sister had both - a vaginal delivery with her first and a c-section with her 2nd. She told me that if she did it again she'd definitely go with a c-section, hands down. She had such a terrible time with her first - major tearing and then an episiotomy. My mom also had that with her pregnancies. I really want to avoid that so I'm thinking of just going right for the c-section.
Anyone else there feel the same way?
Re: Is it your choice to have a c-section?
11.2011 - DS1
02.2013 - loss at 6 wks
06.2014 - DS2
10.2015 - loss at 12 wks
03.2017 - DD
Yes, they were both my choice.
I was 42w3d pregnant with DS1 when I decided that I did not want to induce. So, my doc scheduled me for a c/s.
My second pregnancy was much of the same. I had polyhydramnios and a 10lb baby, I was worried about uterine rupture with a VBAC and also cord prolapse once my water broke. I also have diastasis recti and a hernia, and I didn't want to strain against the hernia.
I didn't wait it out, I scheduled the c/s at 39w exactly. He was jaundiced, but 10lbs at 39w.
DS born via unplanned C-section at 40w6d
It was not my choice, and I would only do it again if i HAD to. I had a horrible surgery, they cut me open I wasn't numb. So I had to get knocked out, and missed the first few hours of my child's life. I had a horrible recovery. I was in so much pain. My stomach looks terrible. I keep getting infected ingrown hairs where my staples were.
And each subsequencial pregnancy would carry a higher risk.
I think that basing your decision to have a major surgery based on how your sister and mother gave birth is not the best decision. You need to research both vaginal and c-section deliveries and know the risks and benefits associated with each one.
For example, did you know that c/s babies are far more likely to have respiratory issues and need NICU time because of them? They are also more likely to have respiratory issues (like asthma) throughout their lives.
You need to research the effect c-sections have on each of your subsequent pregnancies. It's really not as simple as just thinking a c/s is "easier".
And of course you will need to talk to your doctor, hospital and insurance provider. A c/s for non-medical reasons may not be covered by your insurance or your doctor may not do them.
I've had no major complaints about my c-sections. Each recovery though, has been slightly more difficult as I've had another child/other children to take care of while trying to heal.
Unless there was a medical reason I would not go directlt to a c-section without trying for a vaginal birth first.
Mom to Carter (6), and Calianne (1).
Proud VBAC, natural birth, breastfeeding, cloth diapering momma!
APS, hetero factor v leiden & MTHFR
bfp #1 - 12.11.07, edd 8.14.08, mm/c 1.21.08 (10w4d)
bfp #2 - 4.4.08, edd 12.3.08, mm/c 5.14.08 (11w)
bfp #3 - 8.3.08, edd 4.15.09, mm/c 9.17.08 (10w)
bfp #4 - 1.15.09, edd 9.26.09, mm/c 2.16.09 (8w2d)
bfp #5 - 6.16.09, edd 2.25.10, mm/c 7.23.09 (9w)
bfp #6 - 8.12.10, edd 4.27.11, mm/c 9.16.10 (8w1d)
one more try -> bfp #7 - 2.11, our miracle baby boy arrived 10.11
ttc again -> bfp #8 - 5.3.13, edd 1.13.14, mm/c 5.30.13 (7w3d)
This. The ob's in my practice will not do elective c-sections.
After 3 failed Clomid+TI cycles, DD was conceived with IUI#1
TTC #2
Clomid 50 mg + IUI#1 = BFP, m/c and D&C at 7w1d
Clomid 50mg + IUI#2 = BFN
Clomid 100mg + IUI#3 = BFN
Lupron + Follistim + IVF#1 = 11ER, 10M, 10F, ET of 1 expanded BBA 5-day blast, 2 Frosties. BFP! Beta 10/13 = 264! Beta 10/15 = 702! EDD 6/21/14
5lbs 9 oz, 18.5 inches long
6 months: 16lbs 15 oz, 27 inches long
My suggestion is that you really have to be as open as possible to any kind of birth because sometimes what you really want to happen just can't. This is true for women who want to have a vaginal birth and are told they need a C-section, but the same is also true for women who want a C-section but are told that their insurance company won't cover it. People here tend to dismiss the latter situation as not being a problem, but for those of us who are genuinely terrified of a vaginal delivery (for whatever reason), it is an issue and it is no less valid than the concerns of the former. Your birth choices and experiences are very personal and no one has the right to belittle you for your birth anxieties, concerns, or preferences.
After doing the research, I really wanted an elective c-section. My doctor was all for it - "your body, your choice" is what he told me. I was grateful that he respected my wishes. The insurance company, however, would not cover it. I was disappointed, but tried to make the best of it. I began preparing for a vaginal birth. I took birth classes with my husband. I hired a doula for support. None of these things have really helped me overcome my very real anxiety issues regarding childbirth.
I found out yesterday that the baby is very large (already nearly 8 pounds at 36 weeks). I may end up with a C-section after all. But if I don't, that's ok, too. I have found it best to keep an open mind.
Yikes. A lot of scientific research has been done. People saying that they had a good/bad experience- yes, that is anecdotal. But the 13 in 100,000 is scientific fact. I believe it is three times higher than your risk of death from a vaginal birth. That is significant for some people. Vaginal births are almost always safer than major surgery. But this is up to a doctor to decide.
I'd never base this decision off of relatives experiences. My mother had three uneventful vaginal births and as you can see, my first birth ended in c/s. This is rare in my family. Every woman is different. I'd just wouldn't unnecessarily put the increased risk on myself or the baby if it wasn't a true medical emergency. I didn't VBAC because I felt robbed of a natural birth. I VBACed because I don't feel the need to ever have unnecessary surgery. Any surgery has lasting effects throughout your life.
This exactly.