My friend has a daughter who just turned 2. She weighs 29.5 lbs and is in the 93rd % tile for height.
The dr. told her her child is overweight and she needs to see a nutritionalist. Really? I just don't see it. What am I missing here. My dd turns 2 next month and is 27.5 lbs.
What are your opinions on this?
Re: This doesn't seem right to me..
I swear some doctors are making recommendations just to keep their jobs, not DO their jobs. Some kids have to be in the 90th, just like some kids are in the 10th. Stupid doctor.
Did she actually say her daughter's height, or just that she was 93rd?
I'm just playing devil's advocate, but if her LO is 29.5 pounds and NOT 93rd percentile then, perhaps, she's a tad on the heavy side.
Like I said, I'm playing devil's advocate.
And FTR, DS was 28 pounds and 35 inches at 2 and he was 75th percentile for both, but he was always a chunkster when he was younger.
My Blog




My Blog




He suggested a nutritionist, not child protective services. I can see how the mom would be offended BUT, playing devil's advocate, perhaps she doesn't know a lot about nutrition (or maybe her pedi has an overwhelming number of patients with parents who are very nutitionally uninformed).
As a country, the majority of the population is not well informed nutritionally. Obesity is an epidemic and while the pedi can't tackle it single handedly, he may feel like he's in position to help educate as many people as he has patients. I would hope that he's suggesting a nutritionist for all his patients - "normal weight" doesn't always equal healthy eating.
He may also be mandated to make the nutritional recommendation based on a height/weight ratio factor that we're not aware of (simliar to an adult BMI).
Education is never a bad thing and if that mom can see it that way, I think it would be a win-win for everyone.
(I'm sure that's the most unpopular opinion you've read all day...)
Yes it wasn't child protective services, but if that was your kid you may react a tad different. Education is key and she is making some adjustments without meeting with a nutritionalist. I just think it was a bit exterme imo.
My Blog




That makes NO sense to me at all. DS was 30.2 lb at 2 (80th percentile for weight) and 36 inches (90th for height). I'm pretty sure that girls' have a lower weight for the curve but even so, it seems odd.
Was she always tracking high for weight? If she's following her own growth curve, then I'd think it was fine.
Bronx Zoo: Summer 2013
To read my blog, click on the giraffe pic below!
outrageous. For the pedi to make a rec to a nutritionist, even if he/she has concerns (which would also be outrageous) means that is one lazy pedi, IMO. DD just had her 2 year visit today. She is 14 kg and 88 cm (so just under 32 lb and 34 inches). SHe is 90th percentile overall. We will switch to skim milk now - but that is all about the fat kiddos need until they are two for proper neuro development. And my pedi - who is a good friend - did joke with DH about the fact this DD is not going to melt away should she miss a meal, but said it's much easier to go into the next few years with a good eater who may show some independence than a poor eater who will just tend to limit themselves even more.
If the pedi had concerns they needed to talk with the family about food choices etc. Plus, while I understand the worry about obesity in this country, I don't think the AAP has recs until the age of 4. Ugh.
Your friend can look it up herself and determine where she sits on the charts. Keep in mind that virtually everyone is on the chart somewhere. And the difference between being in the 90th percentile and the 50th percentile when you are 2.5 feet tall is not that much.
If she's eating in a healthy, balanced way and getting adequate activity, don't worry about it. But if she is giving in to requests for snacks at night or extra treats to keep the peace, then maybe she should rethink some things.
ETA: meeting with a nutritionist is the very definition of getting educated.