DH and I had a disagreement last night about how long I should let DS "fuss". He's not spoiled (at least I don't think so). He's a really good baby, usually only cries when he's tired or hungry. When he starts getting fussy or irritable I either change his current activity or end up holding him for a while. I don't see anything wrong with this but DH believes this will make him spoiled and a "Mama's boy". Do you let your LO's cry sometimes?
Re: Letting him cry...
Just a guess from the mama's boy comment...DH may be a little envious of the bond you and DS share. Maybe designate a certain time of night for DH and him to connect. My DH does the majority of DSs bath. He gets him out and in his jammies and no matter how much I want to go in there when DS fusses, I don't. Then, when my DH gets him cozy and DS calms down, he feels like a rockstar!!
I realize this doesn't answer your question...but I hope it helps : )
I do the same thing. I think there will come a time when I will probably let DD cry or fuss a little longer to let her figure it out on her own, but I don?t think we?re there yet. I still want her to feel like if she needs me I will be there. As corny as it sounds, I don?t want her to ever feel scared or not secure. I know I?ll need to let it go at some point, but right now, if she is upset in anyway, mom will be there!
I think we are married to the same man lol.. or, alot of men share this view. Either way, I am not about 'toughening' up my 3 month old, thank you very much, we will get there at the right time!
If she's been fed, loved, changed and is just crying for the sake of it, yeah, I'll let her cry a bit.
Usually just long enough to check what's in the oven, finish unpacking the diswasher, put the last of the laundry away etc...then I'll go get her. Or if I'm in the shower she waits until I'm done.
I believe that completely. Also, I feel the same. The first four months of his life have practically disappeared. I want to snuggle my baby boy as long as I can.
all of this.