We *may* be moving. If we did it would be a 1,400 mile drive. We'd do it in 4 days (could take longer if we HAD to). We'd have our baby and two dogs (in a minivan).
The other option is one of us flying out, leaving baby with ILs, flying back, and driving out with the dogs. This would require us to be away from LO for 3 days, plus he'd have to fly (we just flew with him, and it was okay- but there were two of us).
He's not a fan of his car seat. But when we were out traveling recently, he'd fuss then fall asleep after about 30mins.
Which option would you choose?
ETA: I should add, we wouldn't be opposed to driving at night (one of us sleeping during the day at a hotel while the other was on baby duty) so that LO would sleep. Not sure if he'd handle it okay, but he does sleep 8hrs at night in his crib.
Re: Would you drive across country with a 4-5 month old?
Given your two choices, I guess I'd try to do the cross-country drive with LO and just build in a couple of extra days to take some of the pressure off all of you to put pedal to the metal.
2 years, 2 surgeries, 2 clomid fails, 2 IUIs, 1 loss, IVF #1 - 10/25/10 = BFP!, DS is now 3.5yrs!
TTC #2 - 6/12 surgery #3, FET #1 & 1.2 = BFN, 12/2012 FET #2 = BFP! DD is 1.5 yrs!
Surprise! 12/16/14 BFP, loss #2 12/31/14
I can't wait for the "im getting a divorce" post in 5 years or so because your husbands were fed up with your disgusting chair asses from playing on the knot all day and getting fired 4-5 times for not doing any work. you guys are all winners!! ~ Laur929
That is good to know. We would have a normal bedtime routine. I guess the plus side of him screaming all day would be that he would probably sleep at night. LOL! He sleeps very well in a pack-n-play. So, that wouldn't be an issue. We would have his bathtub with us too. So, that would help. He loves his nightly bath (read: is obsessed with it).
I'm also glad to see that people would rather not be away from their LOs. Being away from him for several days makes me nervous!
We'll miss you sweet Debbie Girl (4.21.12) and sweet Cindy Girl (8.9.12)

They are large (70lbs each), old, and very nervous. They do great in cars, but flying them would really be too much for them. They are very sensitive gals.
We'll miss you sweet Debbie Girl (4.21.12) and sweet Cindy Girl (8.9.12)

I would fly. It just seems faster and easier all around. It sucks either way but seems like the lesser of two evils. And if you know LO is safe with the ILs use that time to recoup on the drive back, get your act together etc.
Then again I'm brave and leaving LO doesn't bother me as much as being trapped in a car with her for hours on end. Kind of like a rip the band-aid and get it over with situation.
This!!! Unless it is too much of an expense in which case I would fly DS to IL's and then make the drive. I just visited my father 3 hours away by car and it was too much for me!!
If it were me I'd try the drive, but if I were you I would fly. I haven't flown with my baby before, so that makes me apprehensive, and she also likes her car seat so I'd just make a lot of stops for her.
But you have experience flying with your baby, AND you said she hates her car seat. I did long drive with mine at 8 and 9 weeks (Indianapolis to Jersey Shore), and she likes her car seat, and that was an age at which she could sleep most of the way. And I would never do it again, because the times when she was crying and I couldn't pick her up or do anything about it were awful, and it was hard to time rest stops and bathroom breaks with her feeding.
Unless you're prepared for 4 days of crying, I would choose the flying option.