Has anyone looked into this? I'm really curious about it because my friend at work is considering doing it and keeps telling me to check it out. She has cyclic vomiting syndrome and has been told that she probably won't be able to carry a baby without triggering her illness. She is probably going to have to use a surrogate, but the drugs for regular IVF for her to have eggs retrieved would also make her sick.
I read a little bit this morning on Natural IVF, and it sounds like it wouldn't give a normal "unexplained" infertile any higher of a chance than an IUI with injectibles?
Just wondered if anyone had any experience with this?

Re: Natural IVF
Agreed.
IVF #1 with ICSI - ER 1/20 (16R, 12M, 10F), ET 1/23 (1-10 cell and 1-8cell transferred), BFP on 1/31 Beta #1 on 2/3 = 68, Beta #2 on 2/6 = 261 EDD 10/12/12
Yeah, she has been hospitalized over 80 times for it. She is stable on medication, but can't be on it if she gets pregnant, and every time she tries to stop the medication, she gets sick.
TTC Since August 2010
Husband SA Feb. 2011 normal
HSG Feb. 2011, clear
Clomid April, May & June 2011, unmonitored
First visit to RE July 2011
Sonohystogram Aug 2011 normal
Sept 2011 AMH test in normal range
Sept 2011 Clomid cycle, monitored + TI = BFN
Oct 2011 Clomid + IUI = BFN
Long break -- tried on our own
IVF #1 June/July 2012 = 4 retrieved, 2 fertilized and transferred, BFP, chemical
IVF #2 Sept/Oct 2012 = cancelled due to poor response to EPP with Follistim (300), Menopur (150), and Lupron (10)
Does she know what her triggers are? My student really got to a point were it was manageable once he knew his triggers were.
It would ensure that fertilization takes place and you can look at the resulting embie to see who it develops. So I think the chance is a higher than an IUI where you don't know if fertilization even takes place.
TTC #1 since 8/1/10; Me:41 and BRCA1+, DH:46
DOR (FSH 24.3)/ terrible egg quality ; homozygous MTHFR c677t
5 IUI's: 2/11 to 6/11 and 1/12= BFN
OE IVF#1-4 8/11-6/12= all BFN
DE IVF#1 11/12 bad embryos= BFN
DE IVF #2 2/13 BFP/Beta hell: m/c 5w6d
CFNBC 7 months, not doing well; decided on guarantee program at RBA w/frozen DE
DE IVF #3 1/14 ET 4BB; BFP;M/C 5w1d, incomplete m/c; MVA extraction in ER 7w1d
DE FET#1 ET 3/1714; BFP, beta 1 3/27= 197, beta 2 3/31= 1586, beta 3 4/7= 13879!!
First u/s= Twins with HBs at 6w2d! We are Team Pink x 2!!
K & K born 11/21/14 at 38wks 4 days
SAIF/PAIF Welcome
http://waitingforraintostop.wordpress.com
Maybe. I think we've all seen fert reports with less than 100% fertilization - in fact, I don't recall a fert report with 100%. Part of the success of IVF comes from being able to produce multiple follicles and eggs and being able to choose the cream of the crop to transfer. Without meds, you have to take what you get, and there may not be any fertilization, or what does fertilize may not be of the proper quality for ET. And on top of it, these lower chances come with the same risks and costs of any other IVF/ER procedure (meds aside).
P/SAIF Welcome
Invisible Finish Line
3T's Traveling Ovary Blog
7DPO Progesterone: low. CD3 BW: normal, HSG: clear
DX: severe MFI (low all 3) and low T. Undergoing replacement therapy.
Your friend might also want to look into IVM-- in vitro maturation (https://www.ivf-infertility.com/ivm.php). I don't know that it is widely done. As I understand it, they take immature follicles out of the ovary, and then mature them outside the body in a dish, thus avoiding all those drugs.
Someone I know who lost an ovary to OHSS after her first (sucessful) IVF mentioned it as something she was interested in to avoid such issues in future attempts.
IVF #1 ET 1 d3 embryo 10/30/11 BFP
3 Embryos frozen (1 d5, 2 d6)
DS born 07/29/12
FET #1 ET 1 d5 embryo 02/10/15 BFN
FET #2 1 d6 embryo didn't survive thaw, transferred last d6. CP