I nursed N tonight, like always and he fell asleep, like always. But when I put him in his crib, he woke up. He wasn't crying (actually he was grinning at me and chewing his fists) so I figured I'd see if he would fall asleep on his own. A few times he started to get a little more vocal - not crying but grunting and moving around - so I went in and patted and shushed him for a minute or two then left. After maybe 3 times doing that, I left him awake and went back a couple of minutes later and he was asleep.
I haven't read Ferber so I don't know all the details but from what I've read on here, this was sort of similar, just without the crying.
Re: Would you consider this CIO?
I wouldn't call it CIO if he was only fussing/grunting/moving around.
Yeah, I dunno - it just seemed so similar to what I've read on here. I wasn't sure what the level of crying would have to be - like would any sort of fussing count. I guess not though
Yay!! Hopefully this isn't a one time thing!
no, I consider that helping him learn how to soothe and put himself to sleep without you holding him.
Join our wiki and tell us what your baby eats for finger foods.
BLOG
Fussing is not crying, thus not CIO.
Fussing ? crying
And CIO or rather, sleep training, is not a fly-by-the-seat solution, as some people often misinterpret it to be. It's a plan of action set forth by a book (often Ferber, Hogg, Weissbluth) that may involve some crying, but often...it does not.
Not all babies full blown CRY when you are sleep training. There are different levels and it's all based on the baby. Some babies are criers, others are fussers, but in no way does sleep training = letting a baby scream. Because not all babies scream. Get it? And also, not all babies that SCREAM are hungry. Just differentiating for you.
Precisely.
Is it CIO by the evil definition? No, but by not going in right away, you are helping him learn how to soothe which = sleep training/fuss it out/whatever you people call it.
I'm over the CIO=let a baby scream. Sleep training is the terminology that needs to be used more around here.