I know this is probably a stupid post, but I'm the only one awake at my house and am editing the fall issue of Contrary, and I got to thinking about this.
One of my former students (Jeremy) is a huge 6'6" lumberjack looking guy, and during winter quarter, his girlfriend had their little 6 lbs, 1 oz baby boy, Kyler. I was teaching a poetry workshop the next town over last week, and Jeremy came to the workshop and brought Kyler (his son), who is HUGE now at 8 months old.
When I asked Jeremy if Kyler is considered a "big baby" on the growth charts, he said the doctor said if he stays that far "above the growth curve," he'll be 6'10" as an adult. WOW.
Is there a typical time when little babies "catch up"? I'm just curious. Liam is still around the 10-25th %-ile, so I'm not worried, but after seeing Kyler, it just made me curious. TIA.
---
NBR--If you're curious about what it's like to be a Poetry Editor, someone seriously sent me a blank page and called it a "Buddhist poem." *Sigh* (Hence the reason I take "Bump breaks" while working.)
Re: Tiny babies sure do catch up, but when...?
DD was born average, at 8 lbs, 1 oz. However, she was a very slow gainer and at 4 months was only 11 lbs, 11 oz, and in the 7%. At her 9 month appointment, she had caught up and was back in the 50th %. At two, she is right on track for her weight, if a little shorty like her momma .
DS was born big, at 9 lbs, 10 oz. He is also a slow gainer, and had gotten down to the 10th %. I am hoping now with the start of solids he catches up like his sister did.
__________________________________________________________________________
Mama's Gonna Buy You A Mockingbird
Been away from theBump for a while, getting active again for all the good advice