I have a question in regards to what is considered natural childbirth. A couple of my cousins had made the comments that they had natural childbirth. Later on we were talking about it and they said that they had pain medication in their iv but not an epidural. Not going to lie I had an epidural and will must likely do it again but had no pain medication in the iv. I wouldn't think that by getting pain med in your iv isn't really going any more natural then having an epidrual??
When I hear natural I think no pain medication. Not that its important but was just wondering what other thats.
Re: Natural Childbirth
This.
I had an epidural and would do it again in a heartbeat.
I've heard ppl say "natural" when they mean vaginal..
When I hear "natural" I think NOTHING (medication) but in all honesty, a little shot of tylenol is NOTHING compared to labor and delivery
med-free birth x2, breastfeeding, baby wearing SAHM
My BFP Chart
This...
I went "natural"...nada...nothing...13 hours of it and wouldnt trade it!
I'm pretty sure her cousins weren't talking about a little Tylenol in their IVs. Narcotics, specifically opiates, are typically used. Examples include: morphine, stadol, fentanyl, nubain, and demerol.
med-free birth x2, breastfeeding, baby wearing SAHM
My BFP Chart
Created by MyFitnessPal - Free Calorie Counter
"><a href="http://www.myfitnesspal.com/weight-loss-ticker"><img border="0" src="http://tickers.myfitnesspal.com/ticker/show/825/1820/8251820.png" /></a><p style="text-align:center;width:420px;"><small>Created by MyFitnessPal - Free <a href="http://www.myfitnesspal.com">Calorie Counter</a></small></p>This exactly!
With my DD 14 years ago i had natural childbirth not by choice! They wanted me to dialate until at least 4cm before they could give me anything, it was a sunday and it took the forever to get me anything after i dialated to 4, by the time they show up it was to late. With my DS last July i was induced and i requested an epi. It was wonderful i would never give birth again if i dont have an epi!
I had a labor like OP's cousins. I wouldn't say I went natural. I do say I went without an epi and that the IV drugs had well worn off by the time I was pushing. (In all honesty, I only got them because my nurses wanted to delay me pushing until my MW came.)
So, I agree with PPs that everyone's definition is different, but if you're going to brag about it, you better have done it truly without meds, IMO.
I would do IV drugs only again in a heartbeat. It worked for me. No judgement on any other methods of labor.
I am not a fan of the term "natural childbirth." I hate to think that I am referring to another mom's birth (like a c-section) as "non-natural." It just sounds judge-y to me.
I prefer the term "medication free" or "med-free" to mean that no pain meds were used. Or even "intervention free" if the birth happened without any interventions at all (no induction, AROM, etc).
I say that I had a "med-free" birth with DD. I went into labor on my own and had no interventions for her labor and delivery.
TTC since 11/05...ectopic pg 4/08...early m/c 6/09...BFP 10/5/09!

Nora B...June 15, 2010...8lbs, 8oz...Med-free birth!
TTC #2 since 7/11...cycle #3 of Clomid + IUI = BFP

Malcolm...September 21, 2012...8lbs, 6oz...Another med-free birth!
This, down to having had a med-free birth myself. I did find that a few people who asked if I had a "natural" birth meant vaginal, not med-free, and specifically, these tended to be people who had no access to pain medication at all in their own labors (because it just wasn't the norm in the countries they are from, because of cost and custom). All they cared about was whether it was a c-section or not since the perception is that Americans get more c-sections than anyone else.
That said, the board on the bump that covers all these issues is called "Natural Childbirth," not "Med-Free Childbirth."
This, exactly!
"Natural" to me means no medication.
I was just curious. Everybody has different reasons for what they decide. But my cousins were almost bragging that they didn't have a epidural.( but that they had pain meds in their ivs) but they kind of leave that out of their story.
So i just had to chuckle and find out what others thought.
This.
Eleanor Noelle - 18/05/12 Claire Elisabeth - 16/-5/10
When I was preparing for DD my DH and I said we were planning for a "medication and intervention-free birth." For me, having a natural birth is more than just skipping pain meds. It means letting labor take it's course as naturally as possible, without any outside interventions (including having them break your water for you, induction, etc).
But, I have heard it commonly referred to a "vaginal" delivery (which, is incorrect IMO), and also med-free (vs. also intervention free).
I say I had a natural delivery -- I had pain meds during labor via IV, but no other interventions. And to be honest, the pain meds barely did anything other than make me feel drugged.
I felt every ounce of pain during delivery -- and that's why I said I went natural.
I had 1 shot of Nubain, not even in my IV as a drip or anything, just 1 shot. The stupid thing was terrible and I felt everything, so next time I'll really go "natural".
I do not say I went natural last time though even though I felt it all.
Honestly, when I hear "natural" I think of medication. I have heard a lot of people refer to a vaginal delivery as "natural."
I had a pain med free delivery, but I wouldn't totally refer to my labor/delivery as "natural" because I was induced with pitocin, and hooked up to an IV the whole time. In my mind, an "natural" birth for me wouldn't have involved being hooked to that stupid IV!
ITA. I also say (if asked) that I had a "med-free" birth. Until they were sewing me up afterwards anyway - then I asked for extra lidocaine!