I have a question. I realize that baby's iron stores run out around 6 months, hence the reccommendation to start fortified cereal and/or give them meat occasionally.
What happened "back in the day" when kids were just breast fed and then weaned naturally as they got used to "table food?" I mean there wasn't always fortified cereal, and it's not like moms had a food processor to offer meat purees. Plus, meat is not necessarily a huge part of the diet of a lot of cultures.
Am I missing something? Were kids just iron deficient from 6-12 months until we figured this out and started giving them fortified cereal in, what, the 1970s?
I guess I am confused. It seems like an evolutionary mistake otherwise. Why would babies evolve to need iron and have no obvious/natural sources of it other than man-made fortified cereals.
Can someone educate me?
Re: OK here's a question about iron (BLWers?)
Unable to even.
********************
You don't understand the appeal of Benedict Cumberbatch / think he's fug / don't know who he is? WATCH SHERLOCK. Until you do, your negative opinion of him will not be taken seriously.
I second CG's thoughts about iron in veggies. and I'm sure most infants had meat before 12 months, think about what our parents try give our kids now way before they should. LOL
There are many sources of iron. Iron-fortified infant cereals are not even that necessary if baby is getting a wide variety of other foods. Eggs, meat, fish, some veggies, and whole grain foods all are great sources of iron. Basically, man-made fortified cereals are just a convenient source of iron.
eta: and yeah, iron deficiency was probably more of an issue, too. With research, comes knowledge. Basically, the recommendations are set to achieve optimal nutritional health.
Well, we haven't done cereals and my DD's iron/hemaglobin levels at her 9 months appointment were perfect. Eggs, meats, and watermelon are great sources of iron and luckily some of my DD's favorites.
As far as your questions goes regarding evolutionary mistake, fetal/neonatal hemoglobin has a slightly different form, which enables it to trasport higher amounts of oxygen than adult hemoglobin. However, the different form also causes it to have a shorter lifespan. Since hemoglobin is made from iron, babies essentially have higher iron needs as they go through it faster.
Absolutely this. And your whole question is why I think the iron scare is a crock of shiit. I think that the food lobbyist prey on us to think that our babies need fortified foods, which I really think is absolutely not true. I make sure Josie eats plenty of meat, beans, dark leafy vegetables, etc. I just think it's ridiculous to think that BM contains no iron after 6 months, it's just absolutely not true.
Francesca Pearl is here! Josephine Hope is almost 3!