Hi all! I've been reading posts on the board and haven't run across this exact question yet. I read that depending on which incision I had for my c-section 10 years ago, I may or may not be a candidate for VBAC. I am going to talk more with the doctor about this in the next few appointments, but was wondering if anyone knew this to be true. I do not remember which uterine incision my previous OB used and I understand that my scar is not necessarily indicative of which way the uterine incision goes. So does anyone know if this is true, which incision, low-horizontal or vertical, would make me a better VBAC candidate? TIA! I really would like to try a vaginal delivery!
Re: Difference in incision types...
Low horizontal incision, aka transverse, is the safest for VBAC. A high vertical or classic incision is more likely to rupture and I believe the rupture is more likely to be catastrophic. Most doctors and midwives will not support VBAC if you have a vertical incision.
Most cesareans these days are done with a low transverse incision and I think that was true 10 years ago too. Like pp said, your medical records from the c/s should have this info.
Also, ACOG now supports VBAC with an unknown incision type. Meaning, if you can't find that information for some reason, you should still be considered a candidate for VBAC. GL!
https://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr07-21-10-1.cfm
I know people who have tried for vbacs with the other type of incision. 1 worked, another was rcs, and the last was a uterine rupture.
I would look for your medical records, but is there no way the ob can figure out which type it is, incase they can't?
Trevor Calvin 12.10.07 7:26pm 7lbs2.5oz 19.75in
Emerson Claire 07.07.11 11:34am 7lbs7oz 20.5 in
Trevor Calvin 12.10.07 7:26pm 7lbs2.5oz 19.75in
Emerson Claire 07.07.11 11:34am 7lbs7oz 20.5 in