We got our 19 week ultrasound and Doc says our little girl has an "echogenic focus", which is another way of saying there's a white spot on her heart. It might be a glitch of the ultrasound, it might be the scan picking up a tendon... but it is also a "soft marker" for down syndrome.
EVERYTHING else on the scan was perfect - no other markers what-so-ever.
From the research I've done, it seems that these show up in a LOT of ultrasounds and always amount to nothing. If she had ANY OTHER marker, I might be concerned, but, right now I just feel like the doc wants me to run a whole bunch of bloodtests and other nonsense that aren't going to give us a difinitive answer, and whatever it is or isn't will most likely be gone by the next ultrasound.
I don't feel the need to test, as there is no family history of down syndrome, and I'm only 29. My doc is not supportive of natural birth (we're in the process of finding a better fit), and I feel like she's just trying to spook us.
Is anyone else going through this or been through this with past pregnancies?
Re: echogenic focus on anyone else's ultrasound?
LO #1 - 1 unmedicated/self-monitored IUI w/ donor sperm.
LO #2 - 1 m/c, 2 BFNs, 4th IUI worked (unmedicated/self-monitored with new donor sperm).
Life is beautiful!
We had this on our 19 week anatomy scan, and since we had already declined the standard genetic testings earlier in the pregnancy, we were not even aware of it until the u/s tech asked us on our 42 week biophysical profile if we ever had the additional genetic counseling for it. I had no idea what she was talking about and freaked out for the next 3 days until I saw my midwife and she went over the results of the 19 week scan with me and explained in greater detail.
Long story short - our baby boy was born with no problems, none zip, zilch - both the midwives and his pediatrician say there is no problem with his heart (and they are both aware of what to look for in regards to this bright spot), and clearly he doesn't have downs syndrome.
Back when these first started showing up on u/s there was a higher rate of them on downs syndrome children, but as u/s technology has improved - the medical community is able to see these more often and so the correlation is pretty much no longer statistically significant. In other words, just as many healthy babies have these as downs babies have these. Without the presence of any of the other soft markers I would do no additional testing - and tell your natural birth unfriendly doctor to shove it for getting you all worked up over this.
Do what you want to do. And good luck finding a new provider!
DS2 - Oct 2010 (my VBAC baby!)
More Green For Less Green