So I was recently at a party with a bunch of kids and mommies. One remarked that her 2 y/o daughter, who has always been small (mom and dad are small too) has just fallen off the weight curve. I thought, no biggie, the parents are also small. WELL. Then she goes into how she and her DH have decided that if DD doesn't like what they're having for dinner, they let her go to bed hungry.
WHAT?
And then, ANOTHER family said they did the same thing with their toddler (who is also low on the weight scale).
Am I the only person that thinks this is a problem? I understand wanting your children to eat a wide variety of foods, but I don't think that you can really enforce this with a 2 year old. I almost consider it to be abuse. You can do that with an 8 year old. Maybe a 6 year old. But a 2 year old???
And a 2 year old who is not even on the weight curve???
Am I crazy or are they?
Re: Going to bed hungry? (long)
Meh, I think that's a major stretch. DS is 2.5 and won't always eat much for dinner. He knows when he gets down from his chair, he's done. Does he sometimes go to bed hungry? I'm sure he does, but then he wakes up in the morning and eats all of his breakfast without getting out of his seat.
Nobody's "crazy", but I don't think it's as big of a deal as you're making it out to be.
(read it. you know you want to.)
anderson . september 2008
vivian . february 2010
mabel . august 2012
Dinner's in our house are SO hit and miss. DD often goes to bed only having had a cup of milk, and possibly a few bites of fruit. She's just seems to not be hungry at dinner - we usually "make" her eat 2 bites of the meal, and then she can get down, but if I let her, DD would have peanut butter sandwich or cereal for every meal of the day - as it is, that's what she has for breakfast and lunch most days (plus as much fruit as I can get in her.)
I think that a 2 year old has the ability to understand if they're hungry they need to eat and if they aren't, there will be another meal in the morning.
Bar tab = $156,000, Bus to Foxwoods = $0, Puking in the Stanley Cup = Priceless
My kids don't get separate meals from the rest of the family (unless I'm making something that I know they can't or shouldn't eat, which happens maybe once a month). I don't see anything wrong with that. If it were up to them they'd have PB&J sandwiches, cereal, chicken nuggets, and that's about it for every single meal. No freaking way am I going down that path. I have an 18 year old cousin who to this day eats almost nothing but McD's happy meals, PB&J, cereal, and Pop-Tarts. At 18 years old. He is so obviously suffering from malnutrition (even with daily vitamins) it's not even funny. His parents never tried to make him eat anything he didn't want to until he was about 5-6 years old, and by then it was too late to change the habits (or more like it was just sooooo much easier to just continue caving than put in the extensive work it would have required... they did try a few times supposedly). I refuse to give in and make completely separate meals, or give snacks after dinner, if my kids don't want what we're having. I think that the long-term effects of that can be far worse than people realize, especially if you don't have the fortitude to change it later after the habits have been set for half a decade or more. And it can be a lot more difficult than just, "Oh no, I've decided to stand my ground now after all these years, so deal with it 6 year old child of mine, or go hungry."
That said, if my kids were below the weight curve (they're not, they're somewhere around 25% and have been since shortly after birth), I would try and get them more calories to supplement the food they weren't eating. I would add Carnation Instant Breakfast to their milk, put butter on their PB&J's, and add healthy fats to just about anything that they eat. But even then I would not make a totally separate meal just because they don't want to eat what's on their plates, or offer a snack as a meal replacement (unless it was severe and their pedi recommended it).
I also try and put at least one thing in each meal that I "know" they'll eat. I use the word "know" lightly because lately they have randomly decided to start hating things they have always loved. (Talk about a PITmotherf'ingA.) It's a rare night that either of them go to bed without eating anything at all, but it has happened a few times, and about half the time they don't eat very much for dinner.
Parents decide what and when kids eat. Kids decide how much.
If a kid does not want to eat dinner (even a skinny toddler) I say fine. Odds are they are getting what they need from their other meals and snacks.
Abuse? The opposite. Giving the child the offering of a balanced meal and letting them decide how much of it to eat is the right thing to do. Offering them cheese puffs or chicken nuggets every time they turn their nose up at something else is just setting them up for future issues.
This 100%. It is the parents job to make healthy balanced meals for the child. It is the child's job to eat it. I was playing "short order cook" for my DS1 for a few months and it was exhausting! After going to bed hungry 2 times, he learned that he needs to eat what we are all eating.
With DS2, we started off with BLW, so he eats what we do (or a varient of it) right from the start and I already see that he is MUCH less picky than DS1.
this is what we do...and what I would do if my kids weren't in the 80th percentile for weight...some nites my kids eat all their dinner and then some...sometimes they pick...and some days they maybe eat one bite and claim to be done and go to bed without really eating...I think with toddlers it is more about how much they eat over a day or week vs. how much at each meal...
I think its a method that has been used for generations. Their children will be fine. They apparently aren't as concerned about their children's weight issues. Perhaps because it does run in their families? Lots of children seem to exhist on air. I personally don't really subscribe to this because making DS go to bed hungry causes him to whine and cry so I usually just offer him a vareity of healthy quick foods if he doesn't like what we're having for dinner. I never offer Mac and Cheese or something like that but if he'd like some plain yoghurt or fresh veggies and a slice of sprouted wheat bread or some beans, that's fine with me.
I just think you have to do what's best for you and try hard not to judge what others are doing.
I wouldn't call it abuse--but I definitely think there is middle ground!
DD is on the small side and has always hovered between the 3rd and 5th percentile for weight. Dinner is always her smallest meal of the day--but she usually eats at least one bite of everything.
After dinner/before bed she almost always asks for a snack--which I always let her have. Usually it's yogurt, cheese & crackers, pretzels, popcorn or fruit. She may not eat all of her dinner--but I don't have to turn into a short order cook--and she doesn't go to bed hungry.
She is very much a grazer in terms of eating...so it doesn't make sense to deny her food if she doesn't eat all of her dinner.