I try and cover DD up as much as possible when in the sun. I wear a rash guard type top on her and a skirt bottom with sun protection. And a hat! She's so fair and blonde, I'm so scared she would burn.
Yep. I did until about age 2-3. It was just WAY WAY WAY easier for diaper changes. A wet one piece is a PAIN to pull on and off. Once she was potty trained and more active in the pool, a one piece was better, as it doesn't slide around like a bikini top does.
Now, she only wears one piece or a tankini. She prefers them, as do I because of how she is jumping in and out of teh pool and I don't have to remind her to adjust her top/bottoms.
IMO, a baby girl in a bikini is not sexualizing her. A baby cannot be sexual. Yes, I know others feel differently and there are always weirdos/pedophiles out there. But honestly, a weirdo/pedophile who finds a baby in a bikini sexual will find ANY outfit to be sexual. JMO.
Until she is one she will be pretty covered up in the sun. After that i don't see a problem with a tankini, but nothing meant to be sexy. If it has a bra top it's out.
I never really thought much about it until DH declared that a daughter of his would never wear a bikini while living at home. I don't think I'd have a problem with it for babies and toddlers (although it doesn't seem too practical, like a PP mentioned), but I recently found myself judging a mom who showed me a picture of her 6-year-old daughter posing in a very tiny bikini. Having said that, I'm content to buy one-pieces for DD, with the exception of the adorable monokini that I bought for her to wear next summer:
Married to my best friend 6/5/10
BFP #1 9/7/10, EDD 5/14/11, Violet born 5/27/11.
BFP #2 4/9/12, EDD 12/16/12, M/C Rory 4/24/12.
BFP #3 10/6/12, EDD 6/16/12., Matilda born 6/17/13.
i totally would for a picture!!! If we went to the beach she'd likely wear a sleeveless onsie, a big floppy hat, and tons of sun block! It's not like she's gonna swim!
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Re: Moms of Girls......
I think they are cute, but not practical.
I try and cover DD up as much as possible when in the sun. I wear a rash guard type top on her and a skirt bottom with sun protection. And a hat! She's so fair and blonde, I'm so scared she would burn.
IMO, the less skin showing on a baby the better!
Yep. I did until about age 2-3. It was just WAY WAY WAY easier for diaper changes. A wet one piece is a PAIN to pull on and off. Once she was potty trained and more active in the pool, a one piece was better, as it doesn't slide around like a bikini top does.
Now, she only wears one piece or a tankini. She prefers them, as do I because of how she is jumping in and out of teh pool and I don't have to remind her to adjust her top/bottoms.
IMO, a baby girl in a bikini is not sexualizing her. A baby cannot be sexual. Yes, I know others feel differently and there are always weirdos/pedophiles out there. But honestly, a weirdo/pedophile who finds a baby in a bikini sexual will find ANY outfit to be sexual. JMO.
Mommy to Rachel 1.15.06 and Ashley 5.17.11
yes, but more of a tankini - easier to change diapers with a 2 piece.
I never really thought much about it until DH declared that a daughter of his would never wear a bikini while living at home. I don't think I'd have a problem with it for babies and toddlers (although it doesn't seem too practical, like a PP mentioned), but I recently found myself judging a mom who showed me a picture of her 6-year-old daughter posing in a very tiny bikini. Having said that, I'm content to buy one-pieces for DD, with the exception of the adorable monokini that I bought for her to wear next summer:
BFP #1 9/7/10, EDD 5/14/11, Violet born 5/27/11.
BFP #2 4/9/12, EDD 12/16/12, M/C Rory 4/24/12.
BFP #3 10/6/12, EDD 6/16/12., Matilda born 6/17/13.
I think theyre cute, however my husband has already put his foot down to the bikini!
The only thing that scares me is that they are exposed to so much sun! Being a red head sun is a scary thing to me.