I believe I've seen at least a couple other ladies here whose babies are suspected to have macrosomia (measure over 90th percentile). My (not so) little guy is measuring in the 96th, estimated at 8lbs 4oz at 36w. My OB is driving me nuts regarding a birth plan, she has changed her mind multiple times regarding how we can proceed and what my options are for delivery (induction vs. c-section, at what point in time, etc). She is frustrating me so much I am almost to the point of wanting to find a new doctor, although I know that will be next to impossible this far along. So for you other ladies measuring over the 90th, what are your delivery plans at this point? What options did your OB give you?
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Re: Macrosomia (baby over 90th percentile): anyone else?
I'm not in that situation (yet... I didn't have a growth scan), but, FWIW I was a 10lb10oz baby and have sisters that were 10lb and 9lb14oz- all three were c-section and my mom's recovery was fine, all three of us grew into normal, healthy adults
My older sister (10lber) was breach and VBAC wasn't really a thing in those days, so I was a scheduled c-sec but then broke the water before the scheduled day, so I wound up coming on my own schedule. My younger sister (9.14) was scheduled early becuase I'd been SO big, and had no complications despite the early arrival.
Good luck with your decision, sorry to hear your doctor isn't leaving you feeling very confident. Maybe get a second opinion at the hospital or within the practice?
First off, I'm sorry that your OB seems to be indecisive about how to go about delivering your LO. I can see how frustrating it is to know your LO is measuring too big and not really know what to do about it.
I have GD, so I was somewhat expecting a larger baby, but I have been good with my blood sugars and didn't expect him to be as large as he was at the growth u/s. At 36 weeks he was weighing in at 8 lbs 8 oz, his head and arms were measuring 38 weeks and his torso/belly were measuring 42 weeks (which is typical of GD babies).
With how he was measuring my OB's main concern was that even if we tried to induce early he would get stuck around the torso coming out and could cause neurological damage. So now I'm scheduled for a c-section at 39 weeks (June 27th).
What is important is doing what your a comfortable with. If your doctor is saying you have options then you need to decide what option you are okay with. Are you okay with the possibility of an emergency c-section if an early induction doesn't pan out? Or would you rather just have the c-section at 39 weeks?
I hope you pick something that makes you happy.
This is my OB's concern as well, my guy is also measuring larger in the abdomen. First she told me we could induce at 39w, then she told me that we had to do a c/s because that's what the MFM recommended. Today she called me and said she discussed my case with the other OB in the practice and they can offer me a trial of labor, induction at 39w if he doesn't come sooner. I am glad they are giving me this option, as I wanted to go naturally and the thought of a c-section terrifies me, even though I know it's safe.
Now I am just praying I go into labor on my own before 39w, as I'd prefer to avoid both the induction and the c-section if possible!
Thanks for all your replies ladies!
I have a growth u/s next Monday to check on her size. My midwives suspect she is very big. I'm consistently measuring 3 weeks ahead and am truly "all belly". Even as a midwife, she brought up the words induction and/or c-section. I take that to mean LO must be a chunker! Their hope is that I go into labor naturally within the next week or two so they don't have to intervene.
My delivery plans at this point are flexible...but I really would like to avoid a c-section at all costs-even if it means being induced. Still hoping to go med free as well, naive as that may sound.