https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2011/05/110525112109.htm
I started taking prenatals religiously at 2 weeks after I concieved. Ovulated on the 14th and got the BFP on the 28th of Dec. So, I got in prenatals the last two weeks that it matters for autism?
Why do they constantly give us things to worry about?
blech
Re: "strong" link between prenatal vitamins and autism
I know it's always something...
I've got a friend who's getting married in June, and has been taking prenatals for at least a month already. Their "plan" is to get pregnant on their honeymoon... they have done everything in their power to try and make the timing right...
She'll be thrilled to read this...
BFP#1 07/01/2004 ~ EDD 03/10/2005 ~ D&C 8/1/2004 @ 5w5d
Same here
I never took prenatals until I got a BFP, and I'm sincerely not concerned.
IF my kid is going to be autistic, he will be. Nothing I can do about it now, I'm certainly not going to sit and worry.
Of course, the prenatal vitamins strongly reduce the risk of various birth defects. It seems like that might outweigh the concerns over the link between prenatal vitamins and autism?
In any case, before I knew I was pregnant I was taking a women's one-a-day vitamin that was supposed to have enough folic acid. I only switched to a prenatal at around 6 weeks when I went to the doctor to confirm the pregnancy.
I think studies like these are interesting and worth considering in the planning stages (I mean why not start the prenatals early in the off chance it might help avoid autism), but I don't let these studies worry me about what is done. It is just statistics and while I only skimmed the article I only saw a correlation not a cause.
Something else to consider: My sister planned her pregnancy, took her prenatals while conceiving, etc. Her son was borderline autistic (a few points away from being on the spectrum). My DD was a complete surprise, and I didn't begin taking prenatals until I was 6 weeks along, and she has no autistic tendencies.
There are some things that are just out of our control, and I think autism currently falls into that category. Not to say that there might be something in the study, but our understanding of autism, and in particular its causes, is very minimal.
Well this kind of made me feel better. I took them for 6 months before TTC, largely because you can store up folic acid which is the most important thing to have in the 1st month. And, I have had a hard time taking them since with the morning sickness, but my dr. said they are most important in the 1st two months (though obviously you should continue to take them even when breastfeeding).
That said, this is one study. I think no one really knows the cause of autism at this point. So, it may be valid. It may not. It is interesting, but I wouldn't take it as gospel by any means.
I think this is the take away message from that article:
"It is widely accepted that autism spectrum disorders are the result of multiple factors, that it would be extremely rare to find someone who had a single cause for this behavioral syndrome"
But since it doesn't hurt to take those Prenatals...
Agreed - I started taking prenatals instead of my regular vitamins a few years ago - my husband said if I was taking a vitamin anyway that I might as well take a prenatal. While autism is not something I would want for my children, I do think it's far less scary than a lot of the birth defects that are proven to be caused by a lack of folic acid (neural tube defects, specifically).
I think everyone is so anxious to find a "cause" for autism because diagnosis is relatively new, but currently we haven't found one. Prenatal vitamins are important in pregnancy anyway, so you should take them, but I NOT taking them isn't going to give your child autism.
This.
My ob/gyn actually recommends all women within childbearing age take prenatals. Maybe she was on to something and kind of knew about this study or whether it is just coincidence, I think I'll be taking prenatals instead of a regular multivitamin.
Mine too - the entire practice encourages prenatals or a one-a-day with folic acid supplement for all of their childbearing-age patients. I always took the approach of the prenatals having components that were good for me to intake (folic acid, iron, etc), whether it was for pregnancy or not.
In terms of the article, I try and take research like that with a grain of salt. There is so much that is unknown with autism research, and until the medical community can determine a solid connection between autism and a particular action, I'm going to try my best to not ignore research, but to make sure I am well-versed on all sides of the discussion. But thanks OP for posting it!
Let's not forget about how they were so "sure" that vaccinations caused autism not so long ago.
my angel babies: 6/10 (chem. pg), 9/10 @ 10 weeks
I misunderstood - from reading the title of the thread and this convo, I though the study said that prenatal vitamins CAUSE autism!!But I looked at the article, and now I see that it's the opposite.
It doesn't seem like it would be that crazy for women to start taking prenatals earlier. I hate all of these fear-inspiring studies too, but at least it doesn't conflict with current recommendations.
LOL I don't eat anything that says right on it that it may cause, ahem, leakage.
my angel babies: 6/10 (chem. pg), 9/10 @ 10 weeks