Sorry this may be a stupid question but what are the main differences between seeing the midwives or the doctors? I typically saw the nurse practicioner at my current practice but a doctor delivered DS. Can a midwive deliver by themselves or does a doctor need to be present? I am considering giving them a call but I am not sure who I want to request to see.
Thanks!
Re: another question about seven hills
I see the MW's at 7 Hills. I had a great experience! Sue Holden delivered my son and there was not a doctor present. I believe that as long as there are no complications, the MW will deliver the baby themselves. A doctor did need to stitch up my 3rd degree tear but that was it.
I rotated through all the MW's during my pregnancy but Sue was on call when I went into labor and I see her now for my annuals as well. I really like her. She takes time to listen to my questions and concerns.
Ditto PP's. Also, you must be considered low risk in order to deliver with a midwife.
The biggest reason I prefer a midwife delivery is b/c they tend to provide more individual, less routine care. For example, they tend to be there with/for you throughout the duration of your labor (unlike most obstetricians, who merely step in for the last push). Also, in general, midwives have a lower rate of section births. Again, in general, they allow much more time (and employ/exhaust many more techniques, with fewer interventions) before turning you over to an obstetrician (only if necessary). In fact, this was my experience with J's birth. My midwife *fought off* one of the OB/GYN's in the practice, who was circling like a hawk and (seemingly) giving her a pretty hard time about giving me as much time as she did. I pushed for over two hours (with a few breaks); but, with her (and my amazing L&D nurses) help, I was able to reposition J in the canal and deliver vaginally. If she had not been there to advocate for me, I still believe that I would've wound up in the OR.