I'll be attempting a VBAC at the end of November and am still very nervous about it, even though I'm sure I have no reason to be! I had to have a c/s with DD in Dec. 2009 b/c she was transverse (my water also broke, and my dr. wanted her out w/in 24 hours; he suggested a c/s after 23 hours of labor). This time around, my dr. is very positive about a VBAC, which should ease my mind, but still...I'm also thinking of using a doula this time.
I've done some research on ACOG's website and am worried about the whole uterine rupture thing, among others. There's a whole list of risks associated with failed VBAC's. I know a VBAC is so much better than a repeat c/s, but I can't help but feel anxious!
Anyone out there been through it, or have any advice they can give? TIA
Re: Looking for reassurance...(kind of long)
Ultimately, there are risks with both the RCS and the VBAC. I personally felt more comfortable with the VBAC risks, as really the only additional (as opposed to a normal vaginal delivery) risk is the > 1% risk of uterine rupture. Plus, most cases of UR (and all of them that I've heard of at our local hospital) have good outcomes for baby and mother.
What risks of failed VBAC's are you thinking of? I do know there is a greater risk of infection if you end up with a RCS after you've gone into labor, but I haven't heard of many others.
It sounds like your doctor thinks that baby's positioning had a lot to do with your c/s, and if that is the case, your chances for VBAC is very good as that is generally nonrecurring. Also, baby's position is something that you can work on throughout your pregnancy. My doula suggested doing 5 minutes of crawling a day. I felt funny, but it worked. At nearly every appointment, my doctor thought that baby was in a great position, and he was throughout my labor & delivery. I also did some of the bradley method exercises and saw a chiropractor who was trained in the Webster technique. You can do things to give yourself the best chance possible - and I'd definitely encourage the doula! Statistically, you're much more likely to have a successful VBAC with a doula (not that that means you can't without).
Only you can decide what is right for you, but just remember that while everyone touts the uterine rupture risk, it is statistically pretty unlikely to happen. There are many, many risks to surgery (postpartum hemorrhage, intestine perforation, infection, reactions to sedatives, etc) and I'm always surprised how often those get glossed over by doctors and even some VBAC hopefuls!
It sounds like you are a good candidate for VBAC. If your baby was transverse than it wasn't a question of whether a baby would fit through your pelvis/pubic bone safely. (And even those who have had that do succeed a lot of the time.)
And if they don't induce you, your chance of UR is quite low, I think.
I've keep debating the same thing because I had a c-section for a posterior baby/small pelvis and in theory, RCS can be safer for the baby- (mortality), BUT a successful VBAC is safer for everyone- including future pregnancies.
Personally, if I didn't have the question lingering in my head about my pelvis/pubic bone, I wouldn't even hesitate to try VBAC.
Just wanted to say that I have BTDT- My first pg was a c/s b/c it was twins and Twin A was breech.
My 2nd pg I was DETERMINED to have a VBAC and I did have an all natural vbac and it was AWESOME
I am also due at the end of Nov and hoping/praying for another successful VBAC.
message me if you'd like more info (I did hire a doula but ended up not liking the doula experience) but let me know if you want more details, rescources, etc..