- Pregnancy
- Baby & Toddler
- Parents
- Getting Pregnant
- Baby Names
- Product Reviews
-
Registry
- Community
-
More
Want a personalized experience?
Download the free app
Babies: 3 - 6 Months
sherbetlemon
member
non-clicky poll: nude baby photos on FB
sherbetlemon
member
I just saw a high school friend's FB page, and she has about 50 photos of her 4 week old son up. He's literally naked in 3/4 of them, and they are all close-ups from above. We're not FB friends, so if I can see these pics, anyone on the web can.
So what do you ladies think? Personally, I am guilty of having over 300 pics of LO on FB. However, I always cover him with a cloth if I'm taking a bath time or nakey time photo and won't put anything on FB if something is showing that would be covered by a diaper (i.e. not just privates but the area above them, butt cheeks, etc) but a couple of my friends have newborn hospital photos taken from the side that happen to show a little bit of baby junk, and I never really gave those a second thought.
Do you put complete nude pics of LO on FB? If not, where do you draw the line?
This discussion has been closed.
Re: non-clicky poll: nude baby photos on FB
Same here.
TTC #2 since 8/2012
Me:28 H:34
Me: all tests normal!
H: Azoospermia (Sperm count zero).
MFI Urologist all test normal.
Biopsy Feb. 14
****EVERYONE WELCOME****
We are the same way.
"Life isn't about waiting for the storm to be over, it's about learning how to dance in the rain." -Unknown
Married 3-1-08 | Nathan 11-24-08 | Kaelyn 11-30-10 | Alicia 8-17-13
I have a strict no whoo-whoo rule when it comes to Claire. I didn't even post her first bath pictures, even the ones where she was covered with a washcloth. I don't have a problem with naked babies per se but I DO have an issue with pervs who stalk the internet. Blegh!
I only have a couple of pics of him in his diaper, but we live in a hot climate, so that's what he's wearing often.
That being said, I have my FB on lockdown - very few people can see those pics, and you can't even find me by typing my name in the search.
I also want to mention something I found out accidentally. My brother had a really cute pic of my nephew in his underpants playing rock band as his profile pic a couple of years ago, and when I typed his name into the regular Google Image search (he is a police officer, so I was curious what would happen if people Googled him), that picture of my nephew was the third one that came up! So be careful what you use as your main profile pic!
Nope! It's cute for family purposes only... otherwise I find it creepy for others to see my kids naked, and it's considered (although not intended) child porn and illegal (not to be dramatic...)
DH and I have an agreement no baby pics on FB unless they don't show LO's faces... fully clothed... and even with that all my pictures are security protected so only friends can see.
He's always in a diaper. He is nekkid except for that, which I don't have a problem with.
Any private parts, bottom included, are not put on the interwebz at all. This includes email.
I have some of him in just a CD because that's all this sweaty kid usually wears just hanging around at home- CD look m ore "clothed" than disposables to me.
Naked pictures posted on FB make me uncomfortable. Baby bottoms I can handle , but just for family, not posted.
I have some pics of DS on FB but none are nude. We did have some taken for Christmas where he was naked except for wearing a Santa hat; he looked like Mr. December and DH thought we were whoring our DS but it was absolutely adorable. My sister has a picture of my nephew running on the beach naked with her dogs on her Shutterfly page but that's it.
I did read an article a while ago that was saying if you have nude pictures of a child poster on the internet like FB it could be considered child porn and you could get in trouble.