I think it would just depend on who was able to view the pictures. If her privacy settings only allow certain people to see it, it wouldn't be so bad. My concern would be that there are a lot of mentally twisted people in the world who I wouldn't want to be able to view pictures of my unclothed baby.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I find it a hell of a lot worse that you posted on a PUBLIC message board then the mother putting it on her private facebook page. Seriously, why in the world would you think that it's ok to post that here?
I think it would just depend on who was able to view the pictures. If her privacy settings only allow certain people to see it, it wouldn't be so bad. My concern would be that there are a lot of mentally twisted people in the world who I wouldn't want to be able to view pictures of my unclothed baby.
This is an incredibly false sense of security. Privacy settings on FB do nothing.
ETA: As evidenced by the fact that the pic got reposted on a public forum like this one..... Just sayin'.
*** Trigger Warnings ***
TTC #1 since March 2011
Dx = Unexplained IF 1 medicated TI cycle & 4 clomid IUIs = all BFNs
June 2013 IVF #1 = 6 frosties + BFP! DS1 born 2/14
TTC #2 since December 2014 May 2015 unassisted BFP ended in m/c at 7wks April 2016 FET #1 = BFN June 2016 FET #2 = c/p August 2016 FET #3 = BFP! DS2 born 4/17
I find it a hell of a lot worse that you posted on a PUBLIC message board then the mother putting it on her private facebook page. Seriously, why in the world would you think that it's ok to post that here?
THIS!!!
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
I completely agree! I mean, it's a cute picture. Definitely something the family could laugh at and enjoy. But, it's not something I'd post online. You never know what kind of psychos are out there....
BFP #1 5/5/2011, EDD 1/12/2012
Philippians 4:13 I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me!
Yeah... I'm thinking you should delete your FB page too if you can't handle what your "friends" post.
Or just do THEM a favor by un-friending them.
I completely agree. Stupid move. No excuses.
But seriously this was a public album that she created... the photos are available for any perv out there. I was more outraged at her original posting of her baby.
Yeah... I'm thinking you should delete your FB page too if you can't handle what your "friends" post.
Or just do THEM a favor by un-friending them.
I completely agree. Stupid move. No excuses.
But seriously this was a public album that she created... the photos are available for any perv out there. I was more outraged at her original posting of her baby.
When she posted them, it was her child. When you re-posted, it is more like child pornography and violating federal laws. How about that?
Yeah... I'm thinking you should delete your FB page too if you can't handle what your "friends" post.
Or just do THEM a favor by un-friending them.
I completely agree. Stupid move. No excuses.
But seriously this was a public album that she created... the photos are available for any perv out there. I was more outraged at her original posting of her baby.
When she posted them, it was her child. When you re-posted, it is more like child pornography and violating federal laws. How about that?
Oh I see, because it's okay to disseminate child porn if it's of your own kid...
*** Trigger Warnings ***
TTC #1 since March 2011
Dx = Unexplained IF 1 medicated TI cycle & 4 clomid IUIs = all BFNs
June 2013 IVF #1 = 6 frosties + BFP! DS1 born 2/14
TTC #2 since December 2014 May 2015 unassisted BFP ended in m/c at 7wks April 2016 FET #1 = BFN June 2016 FET #2 = c/p August 2016 FET #3 = BFP! DS2 born 4/17
Yeah... I'm thinking you should delete your FB page too if you can't handle what your "friends" post.
While it may have been lacking in judgement to post it on here, let's not get out of hand. That picture was not child porn.
Or just do THEM a favor by un-friending them.
I completely agree. Stupid move. No excuses.
But seriously this was a public album that she created... the photos are available for any perv out there. I was more outraged at her original posting of her baby.
When she posted them, it was her child. When you re-posted, it is more like child pornography and violating federal laws. How about that?
Oh I see, because it's okay to disseminate child porn if it's of your own kid...
TTC #1 since April '11.- BFP 7/3/11! - EDD 3/13/12 - Dean born 3/15/12! - Lovely Labor Buddies with PsychGirl33!! </br>
Is this for real? Did OP really re-post a picture of a naked child? And that is somehow *better* and less outrageous than the mother posting it on her FB page? I mean, I've seen OP post some stupid stuff on here, but this just takes the cake. Big huge from me.
wow, i'm glad i missed this. if someone posted a picture of my child on a public message board i would kick their a**.
Agreed. I saw the original post before it was deleted. IMO, the picture wasn't bad, certainly not tantamount to child pornography as she was essentially claiming. However, it wasn't the OP's picture to post and certainly not on a public message board. Misappropriating someone else's picture can get her in a world of trouble.
I also find it interesting that she also took her siggy pics down as well.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Agreed. I saw the original post before it was deleted. IMO, the picture wasn't bad, certainly not tantamount to child pornography as she was essentially claiming. However, it wasn't the OP's picture to post and certainly not on a public message board. Misappropriating someone else's picture can get her in a world of trouble.
I also find it interesting that she also took her siggy pics down as well.
I was wondering about the same thing...seems strange...although I can't say I mind. After reading about their "intense" sex, I had a hard time looking at that pic the same way.
LOL! I don't normally give a hoot, but she has rubbed me the wrong way since her day 1. So, good riddance, or you can probably find her on January 2012 being hopeful.
Agreed. I saw the original post before it was deleted. IMO, the picture wasn't bad, certainly not tantamount to child pornography as she was essentially claiming. However, it wasn't the OP's picture to post and certainly not on a public message board. Misappropriating someone else's picture can get her in a world of trouble.
I also find it interesting that she also took her siggy pics down as well.
I was wondering about the same thing...seems strange...although I can't say I mind. After reading about their "intense" sex, I had a hard time looking at that pic the same way.
bwahahaha...so glad I missed that post!
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Agreed. I saw the original post before it was deleted. IMO, the picture wasn't bad, certainly not tantamount to child pornography as she was essentially claiming. However, it wasn't the OP's picture to post and certainly not on a public message board. Misappropriating someone else's picture can get her in a world of trouble.
I also find it interesting that she also took her siggy pics down as well.
I was wondering about the same thing...seems strange...although I can't say I mind. After reading about their "intense" sex, I had a hard time looking at that pic the same way.
LOL! I don't normally give a hoot, but she has rubbed me the wrong way since her day 1. So, good riddance, or you can probably find her on January 2012 being hopeful.
I'm so glad I'm not the only one who felt this way!
And I'm also glad I missed that "intense sex" post. Blech.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
Agreed. I saw the original post before it was deleted. IMO, the picture wasn't bad, certainly not tantamount to child pornography as she was essentially claiming. However, it wasn't the OP's picture to post and certainly not on a public message board. Misappropriating someone else's picture can get her in a world of trouble.
I also find it interesting that she also took her siggy pics down as well.
I was wondering about the same thing...seems strange...although I can't say I mind. After reading about their "intense" sex, I had a hard time looking at that pic the same way.
How did I {not that I'm complaining!} miss this? Geez...
This is exactly why I don't have FB. Too many people don't think twice about their actions (e.g. reposting a picture in a public message board). If I had posted a picture of my child, clothed or not, and someone else reposted it in this type of context I'd be so ticked. The internet is a scary place.
BM to Kenzie 9/1/04 --- Married 1/22/09 ---
Me 27 - DH 25 --- TTC our first since April 2010
Re: some people are stupid (FB vent)
I actually thought it was cute ~ sorry !
However, putting it on FB and also posting nude baby pics, uncalled for. She has too much time on her hands
Trying since Jan 2011. Unexplained IF.
2 IUIs = BFN.
1 IVF (Dec 2013) = BFN.
FET, 2 frosties (June 13, 2014)
14dp5dt-June 27 -BFP, beta 2061. 2nd beta >5000, 3rd beta >5000, 2 sacs 06/30.
Twin Girls - 02/11/15 - at 37 weeks (no NICU, home with me at 3 days).
Honestly, I find it more offensive that you re-posted a pic of someone's baby.
Not cool.
I think it would just depend on who was able to view the pictures. If her privacy settings only allow certain people to see it, it wouldn't be so bad. My concern would be that there are a lot of mentally twisted people in the world who I wouldn't want to be able to view pictures of my unclothed baby.
<a href="http://s1127.photobucket.com/albums/l629/trocknco/Quentin/?action=view
This is an incredibly false sense of security. Privacy settings on FB do nothing.
ETA: As evidenced by the fact that the pic got reposted on a public forum like this one..... Just sayin'.
TTC #1 since March 2011
1 medicated TI cycle & 4 clomid IUIs = all BFNs
DS1 born 2/14
TTC #2 since December 2014
May 2015 unassisted BFP ended in m/c at 7wks
April 2016 FET #1 = BFN
June 2016 FET #2 = c/p
August 2016 FET #3 = BFP!
DS2 born 4/17
THIS!!!
Yes you are right. I deleted it.
I completely agree!
I mean, it's a cute picture. Definitely something the family could laugh at and enjoy. But, it's not something I'd post online. You never know what kind of psychos are out there....
BFP #1 5/5/2011, EDD 1/12/2012
Philippians 4:13 I can do all things through Christ who strengthens me!
My BFP Chart:
Yeah... I'm thinking you should delete your FB page too if you can't handle what your "friends" post.
<a href="http://s1127.photobucket.com/albums/l629/trocknco/Quentin/?action=view
I completely agree. Stupid move. No excuses.
But seriously this was a public album that she created... the photos are available for any perv out there. I was more outraged at her original posting of her baby.
When she posted them, it was her child. When you re-posted, it is more like child pornography and violating federal laws. How about that?
<a href="http://s1127.photobucket.com/albums/l629/trocknco/Quentin/?action=view
Oh I see, because it's okay to disseminate child porn if it's of your own kid...
TTC #1 since March 2011
1 medicated TI cycle & 4 clomid IUIs = all BFNs
DS1 born 2/14
TTC #2 since December 2014
May 2015 unassisted BFP ended in m/c at 7wks
April 2016 FET #1 = BFN
June 2016 FET #2 = c/p
August 2016 FET #3 = BFP!
DS2 born 4/17
https://www.missingkids.com/missingkids/servlet/PageServlet?PageId=1504
<a href="http://s1127.photobucket.com/albums/l629/trocknco/Quentin/?action=view
<a href="http://s1127.photobucket.com/albums/l629/trocknco/Quentin/?action=view
ditto
Agreed. I saw the original post before it was deleted. IMO, the picture wasn't bad, certainly not tantamount to child pornography as she was essentially claiming. However, it wasn't the OP's picture to post and certainly not on a public message board. Misappropriating someone else's picture can get her in a world of trouble.
I also find it interesting that she also took her siggy pics down as well.
LOL! I don't normally give a hoot, but she has rubbed me the wrong way since her day 1. So, good riddance, or you can probably find her on January 2012 being hopeful.
bwahahaha...so glad I missed that post!
I'm so glad I'm not the only one who felt this way!
And I'm also glad I missed that "intense sex" post. Blech.
How did I {not that I'm complaining!} miss this? Geez...