I have been a lurker here for a while. I think I may have posted once or twice. You ladies are such an inspiration for women like me who aspire to have VBACs! I value your opinion and wanted to get your thoughts - posted this on June 2011 board too.
I am considering a switch from my OB/GYN to a midwife who attends hospital births at a different hospital than the one I would use if I remain with my OB/GYN. I have never even stepped foot in the hospital that the midwife is affiliated with, but I have read/heard good things about it and know what its childbirth center offers generally. I am over 31 weeks at this point and am a bit nervous about making the switch this late in my pregnancy. My insurance has confirmed that the midwife is a preferred provider.
I really want to have a VBAC and feel that using a midwife will be more conducive to achieving my goal. My only concern is that the midwife asks you to commit ahead of time to 'natural birth' (I like the idea of having the option of Epidural even though I don't want to use it this time around; it's nice to know it's there if the pain becomes absolutely unbearable). Also, she requires a doula and I had decided to go without one, so now I'll need to continue interviewing.
What do you think? Anyone dealt with a switch?
Re: XP: Would u switch from OB to Midwife at 31 wks?
Hmm. First I think that switching at 31 weeks is fine, especially if you are having doubts about your current provider. I kept thinking about switching during my first pregnancy but never went through with it or even looked into my options thoroughly--and I ended up really regretting that. I ignored my gut instincts that were telling me something.
Midwives generally have lower c/s rates than OBs, even when you control for low-risk pregnancies, so I think you may have a better shot at VBAC with a midwife. You'd have to compare this individual midwife's stats with your OB's stats though, because this is just a generalization.
That said, I really dislike that this midwife wants you to commit ahead of time to no epidural. That really infringes on patient autonomy IMO. It's one thing to be delivering at home or in a birth center where an epidural is not available; but even then, you have the option of transferring to a hospital should you decide you want one. It strikes me as unethical of her to request this. I also don't like that she requires you to have a doula. I would be hesitant to sign on with any care provider who pressures me to give birth a certain way, whether they are a midwife or physician, whether they are pressuring me to have an epidural or not have one. There are ladies on here who had great VBACs with epidurals and I don't like the idea that you would feel pressured not to have one during labor because your care provider made you give her a "commitment." What would she do if you got one anyway? Would she treat you badly, etc.?
I think you should switch if you are not comfortable. That said, I don't really like that you are forced to "commit" to certain things ahead of time. My first baby was with midwives at a free standing birth center, so I had to sign that I understood that I would not get an epidural there because it was not in a hospital. But if you are IN a hospital, I don't see why you have to commit to that. I think a doula is a great thing and could only be positive.
But do I think you should switch providers if you are uncomdfortable? Yes. But switch to a provider that you are comfortable with. The midwife that delivered my VBAC baby was extremely supportive.
Thanks so much for all the feedback, ladies. It is great to hear someone's experience with WISDOM.
I think my fear is that, although my current OB is very supportive of the VBAC and thinks I'm a good candidate, there is a high likelihood that he won't be on call when I deliver. Then, I'll end up with one of his partners who I'm not sure support VBAC as much as he does; this is the same practice that gave me my first C-section which my current OB has called 'unnecessary based on [my] records'.
I had already planned to try to go natural without an Epidural, but part of me just wants the option even if I don't take it. My DH is also a little nervous about there being push back on the Epidural if I want it since he hates seeing me in pain.
In terms of the doula, I had planned to hire one early on and had already started the interviewing process, but then decided that I didn't want to shell out the $1100 that the doula I wanted was requiring.
On the one hand, I think that choosing to go with a midwife practice and switching to a very supportive hospital made all the difference for me. I had the odds stacked against me, and having the full support of my hospital, nursing staff, doula, and CNMs was priceless. I switched fairly early on (around 12 weeks).
However, I would be very concerned about the "natural birth" commitment. I had prepared for and planned on a natural birth, but I ended up needing to be induced for my VBAC due to low fluid. Because of this, my labor was extremely slow (induction started Tuesday night, and DS was born Friday morning). Eventually, on Thursday morning, there was a point where I was about to give up and I started asking for a repeat C. It was my dear midwives that convinced me to get an Epidural. There is no way I could have been successful without my Epi (and my boluses); the pain and duration of my back labor just became too much to handle.
And by the way, doulas are fantastic. I loved mine.