Do you ever feel weird calling your babies twins? Mine were conceived via IVF and if we didn't implant two, then they both wouldn't be here. It was our choice and they very well could've been born years apart if we would've waited and done the second one later. They are essentially just siblings, but that is also the case for any fraternal twins conceived spontaneously I suppose. I often notice that I don't call them the twins...to me, they are just the babies. I guess I sometimes feel like I'm in the "club" because I know someone, not because I really belong - if that analogy makes any sense.
Not that it really makes any difference, just wondering if anyone else ever thought that way?
Re: if you have fraternal twins via IVF
I definitely consider them twins, but DH and I have talked several times about how if we had frozen one embryo or the other, that it would be so strange that they could be brothers that are several years apart. I also don't think they are as interesting as identical twins. ID twins just fascinate me!!
I always laugh to myself when people are like, "OMG, were you SO surprised that you were having twins?!" I always say yes, but think, nooo....it was always very probable!
no. my babies are twins. It doesn't matter to me how they came to be.
I carried them at the same time and gave birth to them at the same time -- they are twins. My high risk pregnancy was not my imagination, it was because I was carrying twins.
No. My twins are just that: twins. They were together in the womb and for their entire lives they'll have the unique experience of having a sibling of the same age. Just like any spontaneous set.
fraternal twins are no more similar than any other siblings- so what MAKES them twins is that they grew in the same belly at the same time..... so no, I don't feel the way you do - mine are twins for sure
  
BUT - i rarely call them "the twins"... i call them "the babies" b/c they are my babies (since i have an older son)... i can't call them "the boys" b/c i have 3 boys so if i'm referring just to them- i need to say "twins" or "babies" or their names.
We so rarely say the word "twins" that i realized Griffin had no idea what Twins were until we saw the sesame street twin episode a couple months ago. Now he knows that he has twin brothers- but he had no clue until then.
DH and i don't really think "we have twins" all the time- we just think "we have 2 babies... we have 3 sons".... but i never think that b/c they were concieved with ART that they are any less of twins than spontaneous fraternals.
I don't think you're being silly...I get what you mean (I thnk). It's not that you don't think they're twins...it's just mind boggling to think that if we'd implanted them at seperate times, they'd be the same people. Just at different times and years apart. Which is hard to wrap your mind around. I've thought about it. Hahah.
This.
p.s. I'm by no means saying that all twin parents treat their kids as the same person, I'm saying when we called them the twins as new parents we had preconceived notions of what "twins" meant and, for us, we had to mentally separate them.
I completely get what you're saying. Part of it for me is that our girls couldn't be any more different if they tried, so it's hard to wrap my head around the fact that they're twins. I think had it been spontaneous, it would feel different. But knowing that we chose to put those two embryos back at the same time makes it feel like we decided that they should be twins, which somehow lessens the "miracle of nature" aspect that surrounds many multiple births.
All that said, I'm beyond thrilled that my girls will have that special bond of being twins, as opposed to "just" being sisters.