an amendment that would have allowed pregnant women, who chose to not
get an abortion, to apply for a court order requiring the father of the
child to undergo a vasectomy, if the pregnancy occurred outside of
marriage and the father previously had two or more children outside of
marriage with two or more women.
an amendment that would have allowed pregnant women, who chose to not
get an abortion, to apply for a court order requiring the father of the
child to undergo a vasectomy, if the pregnancy occurred outside of
marriage and the father previously had two or more children outside of
marriage with two or more women.
I don't this could possibly hold up in court if passed. Just as you can't make a woman use birth control or tie her tubes, you can't make a man get a vasectomy.
an amendment that would have allowed pregnant women, who chose to not
get an abortion, to apply for a court order requiring the father of the
child to undergo a vasectomy, if the pregnancy occurred outside of
marriage and the father previously had two or more children outside of
marriage with two or more women.
I don't this could possibly hold up in court if passed. Just as you can't make a woman use birth control or tie her tubes, you can't make a man get a vasectomy.
That's what I was thinking reading that...there's no way on earth that would ever hold up in court.
The bill passed but not with the amendment. I thought it was an interesting way to even up the whole thought process. Why should a man be forced to get a vasectomy when a woman is being forced to listen to something she may not want to.
Re: Vasectomy Clause?
I think this is what the clause is (boiled down):
an amendment that would have allowed pregnant women, who chose to not get an abortion, to apply for a court order requiring the father of the child to undergo a vasectomy, if the pregnancy occurred outside of marriage and the father previously had two or more children outside of marriage with two or more women.
I don't this could possibly hold up in court if passed. Just as you can't make a woman use birth control or tie her tubes, you can't make a man get a vasectomy.
That's what I was thinking reading that...there's no way on earth that would ever hold up in court.
Exactly. This amendment may actually serve to kill the bill since the amendment is not enforceable.
wait. i thought i read the bill passed. confused...
The bill passed but not with the amendment. I thought it was an interesting way to even up the whole thought process. Why should a man be forced to get a vasectomy when a woman is being forced to listen to something she may not want to.
I think the whole bill is just wrong!
Married and it feels so good!