LOL flame me if you want but I feel like every time a kid goes through a rough patch in the sleep department it's the "four month wakeful." I'm not saying it completely doesn't exist, but it doesn't matter if the kid is 3 months or 5 months or anywhere in between, if they suddenly have one growth spurt that lasts 2 days or a whole month of getting up every hour. It's all the "4 month wakeful." I'm starting the think the real "4 month wakeful" is just the simple fact that almost every kid goes through a bad sleep spell.
WDYT?
Re: 4 month wakeful is overrated.
I disagree. DD#1 went through it and now DD#2 is going through it. If it was just a growth spurt I would imagine it would be like every other growth spurt. But DD#2 is up for hours on end in the middle of the night. It's not just that she wants to eat, she just won't sleep. She has had more than enough growth spurts too but this is a totally different beast.
But the 4 month wakeful is one of those things that either you believe in or you don't. I'm a believer.
Yeah I get that. I think it has more to do with the developmental milestones. Right around the time that they start being a little more aware and start rolling and what not, that's when it all goes to hell in a handbasket.
I was never blessed with a great sleeper to begin with. She still nursing anywhere from 3-5 hours at night so this up every 2 hours and up for 2 hours straight stuff is starting to get to me. lol
And I know for certain that kids sleep like crap at all ages. Heck my 2 year old still wakes up anywhere from 0-3 times a night.
Obviously, Abigail isnt quite 4 months yet, but I totally agree. There are so many posts complaining about this and it seems like what they are describing is pretty normal and nothing special.
I wouldnt say I've been blessed with an amazing sleeper(just sttn first time last night-yay!) but I havent experienced these horrible "is this the 5 week and 2 day growth spurt?" issues, so I dont expect to deal with the magic 4 month wakeful. (hoping and praying I didnt just jenx myself
)
A + Life
Me:24 DH:27
TTC #2 since August 2011
DX: Low AMH 1.79 Mildly elevated FSH 9.9
1 month of Letrozole, 3 IUI's with Letrozole, All BFN. 1 canceled IVF cycle, BFN.
May 2013 IVF w/ICSI #1.5: Start BCP 5/8 2 pills a day. Suppression Ultrasound 5/29. Begin Dexamethasone & Lupron Microdose 5/31. Started Gonal F and Menopur 6/2.
ER 6/12 13R,9M,8F.
5DT CANCELLED due to moderate OHSS
5DT UNcancelled due to embryos not being capable of cryopreservation
Transfered 2 "poor quality" embryo's on 6/17
No frozen embryos.
Beta #1 6/25 6. Chemical Pregnancy confirmed. Beta #2 6/28 -1
Done trying
My kid has been in the 4 month wakeful for 2.5 months now.
He so wins!
This. DS has been STTN since roughly 8 weeks. I think I find it harder to get up in the middle of the night with him when he has a rough night and wakes up, than I would if I was USED to getting up with him every night. Luckily he doesn't have too many rough nights, though they've been more frequent lately. A lot of times it's just really early mornings (like 4 instead of the normal 5/5:30). Plus this last week or so has sucked because he's teething / has a cold and both DH and I have been sick. Although I think the cold has finally run its course.
My view: he wakes up because he needs something - whether it's a bottle, to be held, or because he's decided it's playtime (those nights are the worst, I think, because it's harder to get him to go back to sleep).
I will say that I have seen it a couple times referring to REM sleep. Supposedly, around 4 months is when babies transition from all REM sleep to REM sleep cycles more similar to adults. Theory being that the babies are not used to the lighter sleep cycle and wake up, sometimes every cycle.
The 4 month wakeful is really just a nickname, hence the reason googling it really doesn't help. But, if you look up when milestones happen, major ones happen around the time, and one of the side effects of major milestones is wakefulness. https://www.thewonderweeks.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=69&Itemid=167