On FB on of my friends is a delivery room nurse. She posted that she was on call and that most likely it was because of multiples. Someone replied that she had a fun job to see all the babies born etc. She mentioned that a set of triplets were just born recently and that they were doing good. One of her friends made this comment "That's cool. Naturally occuring ones or were they fixed, not sure of the right word. Gotten by fertility drugs or something?" She responded with "They were naturally occurring, which is really rare for triplets. I was surprised. I figured they would be in vitro but they weren't."
People (even nurses) are so clueless about multiples. That is why I never flame for people calling them natural. I do correct the term but I dont do it in a shame on you sort of way. I do find the "or were they fixed" part a bit flame worthy but I try to remember that not everyone is familiar with multiples and its just lack of education about it and the proper terms.
Re: "Naturally occurring" multiples. LOL.
were they FIXED? LOL that's a new one.
"naturally occuring" is actually appropriate --- they ARE naturally occuring, if they are spontaneous.... that is different than saying "natural" on it's own... b/c "natural" incinuates that they are "artificial" children, if concieved with IF assistance. "Natrually occuring" is just fine, if you ask me... it's putting the description of "natural" on the word "occuring"... not on the child.
I never knew what was appropriate before i had my own twins... I generally just didn't ask b/c I knew that asking at all was like asking "how's your vagina today?" to someone.
spontaneous trips ARE rare - so I think it's OK for the nurse to be surprised by it, too. I know I am when i hear about them!
I agree.
My twins Benjamin and Olivia
I've found that people just aren't really familiar with the term "spontaneous twins/triplets". I've a had a few people ask, if ours are natural or if we used fertility treatments. I usually answer with, "They are spontaneous twins." Which then gets a weird look from the person asking. I would however, think that nurses are familiar with the term "sponateous" . . . . .
Oh yeah, definitely!
I've had one person ask me,"if they were natural" and I replied with something to the effect of, "Well, we used Clomid to help with fertility, but I have to tell you that the more PC way to ask would be, "Are they spontaneous twins?""
I know I had no idea before I met you ladies what was PC and what was offensive...never thought about it before we conceived multiples ourselves, so I feel the need to kindly educate people when they don't know.
I have yet to have the nerve to tell someone that it is actually a rude question...I just feel rude correcting them! I also had to appologize to my girlfriend whose twins were delivered last fall for asking her if they had conceived using clomid. (which is none of my business!) We were taking Clomid ourselves at the time and I was mostly curious because I knew they had had difficulty and wanted to hear a success story!
Please don't use the word "retarded" in this way. I find it far more offensive than making a mistake about spontaneous twins.
If you haven't seen this:
https://www.themompetition.com/2010/11/moms-of-multiples-are-freaks-of-nature.html?spref=fb
"Are they natural?"
"They are not robots and are made from organic matter."
This is the 2nd time in a week that you've used the term retarded as a descriptor. It's offensive. It was the first time, and it still is now.
If you insist on educating people about the correct terms for twins, you should be equally open to educating yourself about offensive terms.
I LOVE THIS!! Thanks for sharing.