Pregnant after a Loss
Michael, Feb 28, 2004. m/c August 2004. Christian, born at 32 wks, June 13, 2005. Benjamin, December 10, 2006. m/c June 2010. BFP July 10. EDD - 5/3/11.
Posts like this...
...make me want to scream... ugh... I just don't know what to say other than I'm not going to that board for a while. -_-;
https://community.thebump.com/cs/ks/forums/thread/47194941.aspx
Michael, Feb 28, 2004. m/c August 2004. Christian, born at 32 wks, June 13, 2005. Benjamin, December 10, 2006. m/c June 2010. BFP July 10. EDD - 5/3/11.This discussion has been closed.
Re: Posts like this...
Lovely. That post has a really bullyish, taunting tone to it. Like, if you're not drinking and pregnant, then you're a dork or something.
MC 9/8/10
Baby Boy Born 7/31/11
I actually gave her advice a few weeks ago on spotting/ leaking and all that stuff. When she responded, she was saying, "Oh I know I'm fine." Really? Must be nice to be able to see in your ute and not have any fears about loss.
Klassy, klassy, klassy
MTHFR 2 copies of C677t mutation homozygous 2/2010
Baby A born via c-section 1/10/12 @38w3d
BFP #1 11/4/09 m/c 4w3d baby crab
BFP #2 12/4/09 m/c 9w3d baby lion
BFP #3 7/1/10 m/c 4w1d baby fish
BFP #4 5/8/11
BFP #5 8/17/12 10dpo beta 7
It's at times like this when I remember what one of my college biology professors taught us regarding evolution. He brought up the point that evolution perpetuates what works, but not necessarily what is the best solution (for example, we don't have titanium skeletons).
Clearly being an idiot has it's evolutionary advantages, because it sure as h*ll seems to work.
FFS.
I love it when an OP is pathetic enough that it speaks for itself.
Hope she enjoys her hangover.