How much input did you have on the # you had put back?
Was it primarily up to you? As in, if you only wanted 1 (to not risk having twins) or if you wanted 2 to increase your odds of getting KU.
Was it primarily up to the doc ( based on your your dx & the quality on transfer day)? If this was the case, did they just flat out tell you what they were going to do or was there any room to negotiate?
My RE told me that they generally put back 1 but will put back 2 in certain circumstances. I'm just wondering what other docs say.
Re: ? on # of embies transferred back
My RE makes a suggestion but it is 100% up to us. We had decided on 2 from the very beginning. But having a blast transfer fail we will now to a 3dt with 3 embryos.
I don't know if that helps but I hope you come to a decision you and YH are comfortable with!
i've always done 2, my RE also rec's 2 for us.
i have limited tries w/ insurance so i would not transfer less than 2.
it will also depend on embryo and quality
Worrying does not empty tomorrow of its troubles, It empties today of its strength. ~Corrie ten Boom
Courage doesn't always roar. Sometimes courage is the little voice at the end of the day that says I'll try again tomorrow. ~Mary Anne Radmacher (thank you beadinglady)
It's been a long journey. TTC since 9/06. multiple IUI's and IVF's and 4 m/c's. IVF#3 = BFP, twins, induced at 34w6d due to baby b passing away (no explanation). Delivered on 35w1d, Baby A - baby girl, and Baby B - baby boy, our little angel.
MTHFR A1298C & C677T, Immune Issues and Factor II
TTC since July 2008
IUI 1,2,3 BFN
IVF #1 C/P, FET 1,2,3 BFN
IVF#2 BFP
it's a girl!!
beta#1 3/21 (14dp3dt)=413, beta#2 3/23 (16dp3dt)=785, u/s 4/11
EDD 11/25/12
**SAIFW**
This is kind of what I was getting at. We also have limited tries and am not sure how they would feel if we insisted on 2. We want to increase our odds of 1 sticking and are 100% comfortable with twins ( although that is less than ideal b/c of the risks that go along with multiples). If we were given a 100% chance that if we transferred 1 that it would stick, we would only do 1.
"Most of the important things in the world have been accomplished by people who have kept on trying when there seemed to be no hope at all." -- Dale Carnegie
"Our greatest weakness lies in giving up. The most certain way to succeed is always to try just one more time." --Thomas A. Edison
Started TTC 05.08
Me: Stage II endo, borderline high FSH
DH: perfect
1 lap, 5 IUIs = 4 BFNs and 1 c/p
2 IVFs, 2 FETs = 1 BFN, 1 c/p, 1 ectopic and finally a sticky BFP in May 2011!
1 FET in Aug 2013 = BFP!
On my first IVF, my RE guided us as to what to do. We had enough to freeze and one great quality 3day embryo, so she strongly suggested we just transfer 1. I think we probably could have pushed for 2, but were happy with one.
On my FET, I felt like we were given a bit more choice. We chose to transfer 2 and will likely do the same next time. Both times though, when we got to the transfer, the embryologists had already made a recomendation as to what they wanted us to do.
Hope that helps and Good luck!
Jan to April 2010 - Clomid - All BFN
June 2010 - IVF - BFN
Oct 2010 - FET #1 - BFN
Dec 2010 - endometrial biopsy
Jan 2011 - Surprise BFP! - m/c at 6w5d
March 2011 - FET #2. Thawed 11 Day 1 embryos; 5 'exploded' / possible lab error?
ET 4/2/11 transferred 1 blast & 1 morula
Beta#1 10dp5dt =81; Beta#2 12dp5dt =222 Beta#3 16dp5dt =1337
It's a BOY!!!
This is literally what happened with us as well. I am 34 so I think my age played into his recommendation for sure.
SAIF/PAIF Always Welcome!
TTC #1 May 2008
6 Rounds Clomid, 1 Round Femera-BFN
4 IUIs (1 Clomid, 1 Femara, 2 injectables)-BFN
February 2010-Laparoscopy
4 months of Lupron
August 2010-IUI #5-BFN
October 2010-IUI #6-BFN
IVF #1 November 2010-BFN
IVF #2 March 2011-BFN
The RE strongly suggested what they thought, but it was our decision.
My clinic basically always reccomends 2. They told me "you cut ur chances in half but transferring 1".
They are more likely to rec 3 than 1, but 2 is what seems most common.
My RE recommended one but ultimately left it up to us with 1 vs. 2. We have limited insurance coverage, weren't sure if any of our embryos wold make it to freeze, and are comfortable with the possibility of twins, so we transferred 2.
It was a difficult decision, but I think we made the best one for our specific situation.
We were in cycle for an IUI but I responded too well to the meds and had too many follicles (9). From that they retrieved five eggs and four fertilized. We had discussed it and thought two would be the right amount to transfer UNTIL we were advised by the specialist (does RE stand for reproduction expert? -- I'm new here) to go with all four. We were a bit concerned but he said the statistics were extremely low for having more than two and so we should go for it. We did. My hCG climbed for two blood tests and then on the third it was back down to 5.5 -- a chemical pregnancy. :-(
Age does have something to do with it -- I'll be 39 in a few weeks. Have you checked the statistics for the fertility center where you're going? That may give you some more info to go on.
Make a pregnancy ticker