I have a friend who is about 38 weeks - she has GD. They started to induce her on Monday. The poor thing still has no baby, she is still "waiting" according to her FB. Not quite sure what the hell is going on as I don't get detailed updates - but I feel so badly for her!
I admit that I don't truly know the risks of going full term with GD - do they always induce early? Clearly her baby isn't ready to come out & I just feel bad that she has to go through this. I want to say that if it were me, I'd push back on my OB - but I have no idea if that's even possible given the risks associated, etc.
Re: question re: GD & inducing labor
GD babies tend to be bigger and therefore have a higher incidence of shoulder distocia (their shoulders get stuck when they are coming out). A lot of OB's will induce early in order to avoid the risk and make sure the baby isn't too big. But there is some controversy about it.
I would have to have some other complications beyond a potential big baby before inducing at 38 weeks. But then, my first was 9 lbs and that was without GD, so maybe my viewpoint is biased.
No, they don't always induce. I wasn't induced with either pregnancy (obv. not with this one, but I got to 39.5 weeks with Henry). Even when the Sequel was measuring big and they mentioned induction at my last appt, I told them no. So it's definitely posssible to push back.
Your poor friend! Sounds like that baby just isn't ready to make his/her appearance.
Hi, I'm just a lurker, but I was induced due to GD so I thought I'd chime in
I think every doctor has their own ideas about inducing early for GD patients. My doctor was worried about my placenta failing and a big baby, because even with daily insulin injections my numbers were a tad high, so he encouraged induction at 39 weeks. If I hadn't been on insulin, or had my blood sugar been more stable, they probably would have let me go until 41 weeks, which is their standard for inducing at their practice.
Nest time, I'll fight harder to let the baby come on it's own, so long as we're both healthy. My induction experience. It started at 38 weeks, 6 days, and after two cervidals (sp?), two days of pitocin, and narrowly avoiding a c-section my little girl was born at 39 weeks, 2 days.
I hope your friend meets her little one soon!
TTC#1 Chart
TTC#2 Chart
IUI #1 - #4 (repronex trigger) = BFN
IUI#5 on 10/28/2008 ** BFP 11/10/08 ** EDD 07/21/09 *** It's a GIRL (07/14/09)
med/treatment free BFP 06/28/10. EDD 03/05/11 *** GIRL #2 (02/23/11)
beta#1 @ 17dpo = 1296 .... beta#2 @ 19dpo = 3034
it's the Bug and Baby Belle!
all good info, thanks ladies!
I hope her LO comes out soon. I just feel badly that it's already been this long & clearly that little guy just doesn't want to make an appearance!
I would assume she's being induced with a cervical ripener (Cervadil, Prostin, or cytotec). It doesn't mean she's "in labor," and it can take days/several doses sometimes.
There's a lot that goes into a GD induction. I had GD. I was diet controlled, so I didn't need medication. Having the background like I do, I was a little more aware of what the magic things meant for an induction earlier than post-dates.
Most OBs won't let you go past 40 weeks with GD b/c of further complications...even if you don't have any other ones in the pregnancy. I pushed for an induction no earlier than 40 weeks. I had stable blood sugars, T & I both measured well throughout the pregnancy, and I had no further risk factors. I also was not showing any signs of pre-ecclampsia.
My OB was ok with this, but didn't want me delivering beyond 40.3 due to risks of deteriorating placenta.I really wanted a few more days, but due to other circumstances, I was induced @ 40.0 weeks. I was apparently ripe enough b/c I was in early labor when I got there.
Trevor Calvin 12.10.07 7:26pm 7lbs2.5oz 19.75in
Emerson Claire 07.07.11 11:34am 7lbs7oz 20.5 in