Good Morning Ladies,
I just got off the phone with my doctors office, and it has come to my attention that they do not do VBAC. So with this being said is that common not to be able to deliver or at least try to have a natural birth? I had a really hard recovery time dealing with a home health care nurse having to come to my house and change my padding. After my cesarean scar slip open 2 days after giving birth. I just cant imagine going threw that agian. Would you ladies look for another doctor? Or just deal with it. Thanks
Re: Planning a Cesarean
TTC#1 Chart
TTC#2 Chart
IUI #1 - #4 (repronex trigger) = BFN
IUI#5 on 10/28/2008 ** BFP 11/10/08 ** EDD 07/21/09 *** It's a GIRL (07/14/09)
med/treatment free BFP 06/28/10. EDD 03/05/11 *** GIRL #2 (02/23/11)
beta#1 @ 17dpo = 1296 .... beta#2 @ 19dpo = 3034
it's the Bug and Baby Belle!
Ditto
It's actually BETTER for the baby to labor! Pushing through the birthing canal gets their little lungs to work better!
There is a less than 1% risk of uterine rupture with a vbac. The ACOG updated their vbac policy last month
https://www.acog.org/from_home/publications/press_releases/nr07-21-10-1.cfm
Pretty much doctors should be helping patients make informed decisions about vbacs. You should at least get a trial of labor.
Maybe try contacting your local ICAN chapter or a doula to see if they can help you find an alternative provider.
You have the right to have a VBAC. It's better for you and better for baby. There was a post regarding this yesterday, I believe, with lots of great links.
Looks like we cross posted.
This and it's also better for the mom to get the natural hormones from labor.
This.
This.
Great minds think alike.
I have a friend who had 2 c-sections, but is determined to have a VBAC with her third. I've read a lot of the research that she's put on her blog about c-sections. The trend is very disturbing to me. Read the other day that if you are induced, you have a 50% greater chance of a c-section. C-sections shouldn't be scheduled for the benefit of doctor's or mom's schedules. It should only be when medically necessary.
I meant natural birth is more traumatizing spiritually and emotionally. Terrifying for baby. And cesarean is quick and easy with minimal trauma to baby and you?ve got a team of pros around you regardless , incase baby had issues breathing which is not the ?norm? Plus if my uterus ruptures during pushing, baby and I could BOTH die...I don?t want to risk it and having had a previous cesarean I feel comfortable with it.
There are varying degrees of uterine rupture. You can have a small one that is similar to a tear and doesn't actually open the uterus. From what I've read it's still considered a u/r. You could also have a full blown rupture like you are describing, and I've heard this is rare! The less than 1% u/r rate includes all types of ruptures. Considering that vbac is as safe as a first time mom going for a vaginal birth, I am having one.
Also,
"The College guidelines now clearly say that women with two previous low-transverse cesarean incisions, women carrying twins, and women with an unknown type of uterine scar are considered appropriate candidates for a TOLAC," (from the link I posted above)
I don't think it's that most doctors won't do a c-section because of the risks. I believe they don't do them because the hospitals have a policy against them. The hospitals have the policies so they don't have to have to spend the money on extra insurance. It's all a matter of money for the hospitals and doctors. Not what is best for the patient.