I was talking with my mom yesterday about my doctor wanting to schedule an induction at my appointment Monday. She said that with myself and three siblings, she was in 'light' labor, the doc broke her water, and all of us were born within 4 hours. I do plan to discuss this with my doc on Monday, but I was wondering if anyone was/is able to opt for getting their water broken instead of Pitocin. My mom last delivered a baby over 30 years ago, so I am sure practices have changed since then. But, I wonder if breaking water is a more natural way to induce. I really don't want to start my labor with drugs.
Re: Induction vs. Breaking Your Water?
nope, I did the pitocin for four hours and THEN they broke my water because my labor wasn't progressing. Ended up having a c-section at the end, anyway.
Good Luck!
Sorry to intrude but I was 4cm when I went in for my induction. He broke my water and had me walk. They didn't start pitocin until I was like 8 cm just to keep things going and they only used a little bit. I started contracting hard on my own within about an hour of breaking my water. I'm very glad they broke my water and didn't start pitocin until way later. My labor lasted from 9 am to 6:20 pm when I delivered so it did take a bit. HTH!
Kristen (7), Timothy (5), Robert (3), Charles (9 months)
If you are dilated at all - even a fingertip, they can break your water. But most hospitals have the 24 hour/infection window, so I'm not sure they would do it just to see what happens.
When I was induced last time, they broke my water and started pitocin at the same time.
Good luck!