We met with a plastic surgeon yesterday for our son's plagiocephaly. She said that there is no medical reason to use a corrective helmet, but we should consider it for cosmetic purposes only. She said that 6 months is "do or die" with the success rate of the helmet. My DH and I are so stressed about making the right decision for our LO! Has anyone else gone through this? I welcome any thoughts!
Re: helmet for cosmetic purpose only?
DD had a StarBand helmet for 3.5 months (5 months to 8.5 months old). While not putting your child in a helmet will not cause any developmental issues it CAN cause lots of cosmetic issues that could possibly turn into developmental issues. For example: babies who do not get helmets when needed tend to have facial assymetry which can lead to blurred vision if the eyes are out of alignment, hearing loss if the ears are out of alignment, slurred speach if the mouth becomes mis-aligned. It is a battle of deciding what to do. It probably depends on your childs "case" and how severe it is. With DD, we luckily caught it very early and decided to move forward at jsut over 4.5 months old & therefore was finished in jsut over 3.5 months. DD had moderate-severe plagiocephaly with a hint of bracheocephaly.
DH and I were really in a hard place b/c our insurance wouldn't & hasn't paid for any of the $2500 helmet. It was so worth it in the end, but you have to be 100% b/c you have to dedicate yourselves to it & the time to it (washing it every night, washing your child's hair everynight, giving them "breaks", etc). It's a lot of work but we don't regret 1 minute of it. You cannot tell DD ever had or needed a helmet. She has a beautifully shapely round head.
....back to what I meant to say about the assymetry. DH and I would not be able to live with the fact that we did nothing to help our DD when we had the option, so we decided to move forward with the helmet. We could not imagine watching her grow with issues that we could have repaired and we didn't want to chance the "unknown", meaning not knowing if her vision, hearing or speaking would be disturbed. For us it was a no-brainer.
Best of luck!
I've become somewhat of a lurker around here, but I'm going to give you my input.
I would probably do it. The back of my head is pretty flat and it actually effects the way I sleep. If I sleep on my back I have terrible neck pain and a headache in the morning.
GL with your decision.
DD had a helmet, a DOC Band from Cranial Technologies. She only wore it for 6 weeks and got it on her 3 month "birthday". Our insurance company wouldn't cover it until she was 4 months old. Not wanting to wait and watch her head get flatter and flatter, we paid out of pocket ($3,500) for it. I didn't want to waste those valuable 4 weeks of growth.
I think it was the best investment we have made for DD so far.
Our son has a helmet and it is his first week with it. He has moderate flatness in the back of his head because he sleeps that way and flips over onto his back and just generally spends too much time on the back of his head. We were told it was cosmetic in our case and that insurance would not cover it and also that it was time to decide since he was 6-ish months when we went to get our consult.
DH said he would regret not doing something to help him out down the road if it causes a problem. So we did it. So far so good. DS doesn't seem to mind it and he's napping right now with it on (his first nap wearing it). We have a hanger helmet if you have questions about this type.
GL in your decision.
DS was evaluated at 5.5 months by the plastic surgeon and she left the decision up to us. We didn't want to spend the $3k if it wasn't necessary (our insurance would not cover a helmet) so we opted to wait until 7 months.
we saw a difference by 6 months. But if we hadn't seen a difference we would have gotten the helmet at 7 months. DS's forehead bulged on one side, the ridge above his right ear bulged and the right side if the back if his head was very flat. Yes, we believed it was purely cosmetic, but being a boy he would probably always short haircuts. So it was something we would have worked to correct. I'm not sure that we would have correct it if DD had a flat head that would have been covered by her long hair (though DD did not have a flat head..
Well technically we did work to correct it. He started sleeping on his stomach and we did a lot of stretches for his torticullus.
There are lots of pedi's that are very mistaken about choosing to do nothing. I'm sorry you believed them.
There are lots of pedi's that are very mistaken about choosing to do nothing. I'm sorry you believed them as well.