I went to my regular OB yesterday and I brought up delivery options. She told me straight out that there was a 90% chance I'd have a c-section. I was so taken aback by this that I didn't even ask her why she thought this (definitely on the list for next time). I've had a pretty easy pregnancy. I did spend one day in L&D for contractions that were not diagnosed as preterm labor. Also, so far both babies are head down, which I know can change over the course of the next ten weeks.
I guess I was just a little put-off because she made seem like it wasn't open for discussion. I honestly don't know which route I would like to go, but I don't like not having the option.
Anyone else experience this or have different insight?
Thanks!
Re: C-Section vs. Vaginal Birth: Did you get a choice?
Thanks for your input! I'm terrified of labor, which is one of the reasons why I'm on the fence about which direction I would choose.
My sister-in-law gave birth to her twins vaginally, which is why I thought there would be more discussion about it from my OB.
Depends on your doctor. I believe the stats are 50%.
Mine said A had to be head down and bigger and then we'd talk about it. (Some docs are comfortable with a breech extraction and some are not.) Both mine have been head up for several weeks, so I don't anticipate anyone flipping. I really wanted vaginal, but probably a c/s for me.
some OBs are ok with vaginal, some are not. Even if you do deliver vaginally they will usually do it in the OR in case you need an emergency C/s for baby B.
I had a choice- but did not want one
I wanted a c/s no matter what - b/c i had a horrible 4th degree tear with my singleton birth - i wanted a c/s even if I was only having one baby the next time. I LOVED my c/s - felt so much better so much faster than recovery from my vag birth.
Sorry this is just now coming up for you. I actually switched from a regular OB at 6 weeks (my very own colleague mind you) to an MFM partially because of delivery. I have personally watched my MFM deliver at least a dozen set of twins vaginally, and I myself have also delivered many sets of twins vaginally (my patients...not me!). Having the option of a twin vaginal delivery was extremely important to me, and I sought out an expert in it.
Now I am 30 1/2 weeks and both babies are breech. Only if baby A is cephalic will I be allowed a vaginal delivery. So all I can do sit here and hope baby A turns. It's truly disappointing to be an ob/gyn and possibly never get to experience a vaginal delivery. That's life!
In the end, it all depends on the experience and skill of your ob. Cephalic/cephalic twins really should get a vaginal delivery....unless there is some other factor besides that precluding vaginal delivery. That's just my personal opinion. If you want a vaginal delivery....it's not too late to find someone else!!
It would have been my choice except the boys stayed breech the entire time. Schedule c/s for me.
Just ask your OB about options. Most have some kind of office "policy" that they use for multiples. Some prefer c/s, others will let you decide if the babies are both in a good position for a vaginal delivery.
Yes- My OB was for what I wanted. Why I love him. I think he was def a little more sided with the c-section just due to experience and what he has dealt with.
If both were head down, we were going vaginally. Esp with my past exp with my 1st. I have no health issues, no complications at all (*knock on wood*) He agreed I was a good candidate for a twin vaginal delivery.
at 36wks, its decided for me, c-section it is. Baby A is breech. Scheduled for July 6th and truth is Im super nervous and scared of the whole process.
I asked my doctor this question right after we found out we were having twins, I was told that as long as both babies are head down then a vaginal birth was definitely an option for me. Luckily, both babies are head down and at this point I don't think anyone will be turning so we will be trying to a vaginal birth, my doctors are very encouraging about it.
They did tell me that I would be moved to the OR to deliver in case I needed an emergency c-section.
Ok, this was something that I felt very stronly about. Like you, I went in for a routine appt and my Dr. basically made it seem like he was just going to go the c/s route, but I did not want a c/s from the time I found out that I was pregnant. At 36 weeks, baby A was head down, baby B was head up so my Dr. said "so you know that's a c/s"; however I knew better that as long as baby A was head down, you could try a vaginal delivery (even his partner told me that at my first OB appt). I didn't say anything, b/c I knew that there was still time for baby B to move, and he did at my 38 week appt. So, I was then given the choice, he suggested just going ahead with the scheduled c/s but I told him that I wanted to attempt a vaginal delivery.
Well, in the end, I knew all the risks and benefits and I delivered baby A vaginally and then baby B flipped and stood straight up, and his feet were ready to come out, so I had a crash c/s as well.
Not the best of outcomes, I did have to heal in both places, but I would still have made the same decision if I knew what the outcome was going to be in the end. Delivering my baby vaginally was a miracle to me, and I wouldn't change it for anything. The c/s incision became a little infected on me, and it was harder to recover and take care of my twins.
GL to you, and remember that YOU are in charge when there are options available.
Ok, this was something that I felt very strongly about. Like you, I went in for a routine appt and my Dr. basically made it seem like he was just going to go the c/s route, but I did not want a c/s from the time I found out that I was pregnant. At 36 weeks, baby A was head down, baby B was head up so my Dr. said "so you know that's a c/s"; however I knew better that as long as baby A was head down, you could try a vaginal delivery (even his partner told me that at my first OB appt). I didn't say anything, b/c I knew that there was still time for baby B to move, and he did at my 38 week appt. So, I was then given the choice, he suggested just going ahead with the scheduled c/s but I told him that I wanted to attempt a vaginal delivery.
Well, in the end, I knew all the risks and benefits and I delivered baby A vaginally and then baby B flipped and stood straight up, and his feet were ready to come out, so I had a crash c/s as well.
Not the best of outcomes, I did have to heal in both places, but I would still have made the same decision if I knew what the outcome was going to be in the end. Delivering my baby vaginally was a miracle to me, and I wouldn't change it for anything. The c/s incision became a little infected on me, and it was harder to recover and take care of my twins.
GL to you, and remember that YOU are in charge when there are options available.
The only way I don't get a choice is if Baby A is breech. As long as she ends up head down, I can attempt a vaginal delivery, which is very important to me. Even if Baby B is breech, all of the OBs in my practice will attempt to flip her after Baby A is out, and one of them will even attempt a breech extraction of Baby B.
You might want to talk to other OBs - a c-section should not be automatic if you don't want that.
After 2 rounds of IVF & 2 rounds of FET, we were blessed with identical twin girls!
For a 1st pregnancy with vertex/vertex (both head down) twins and an uncomplicated pregnancy I'm not sure why the quote would be 90%. I would think that would be the ideal situation for a TOL-trial of labor.
I was hoping to VBAC my mono/di twins, but I have one vertex and one breech and I had arrest of descent/dsytocia/stalled labor during my first labor and this poses a grave concern of reoccurence, since I pushed for two hours and my baby stayed in +2 station, and 1 and 1/2 hours of that I pushed in a squatting position so I was working with gravity.
The positioning of my babies, combined with the shared placenta, my previous labor experience and my scar all points towards a scheduled c-section being the safest option for me.