I just took a breastfeeding class and the instructor recommended NOT using pacifiers. She went on to explain how they don't really serve a purpose because if LO is crying it is for a reason and it's better to just find out what it is instead of just shoving a pacifier in their mouth. I had never really thought of it before but I think it makes sense. So I was just wondering if anyone out there is planning on not using them.
On a side note, yesterday we were with some friends who have a 1 year old and the mom was telling me how they never used them either. I was pretty shocked cuz I guess I assumed everyone used them! WDYT?
Re: Is anyone planning on NOT using pacifiers?
Cam 6.6.10 - Autism, Global Developmental Delay, Mixed Receptive/Expressive Communication Disorder
I breastfed both of my children, Oldest took a paci immediately in the hospital after his circumcision. My 2nd refused to take a paci and would gag whenever you tried to give her one. After both, I would say paci baby definitely easier , so easy to quiet the fussiness sometimes otherwise you breast becomes a pacifier like very 30 minutes when they are alraedy full!
I am hoping #3 takes the pace, I never had issues with nipple confusion or not having enough supply! Oh baby #2 is almos 5 and still sucking her thumb and baby #1 gave up paci at 10 months with out a problem!
It's all going to depend on your baby, honestly. Some babies do fine without them while other babies have a greater sucking comfort need.
My DD is a paci baby. Always was. Once I knew I wouldn't be able to nurse and had to exclusively pump, I offered a pacifier. It made a huge difference in DD's temperament. We're starting to wean off of it now, but not pushing the issue.
I won't know if DS will use one or not until he's here. He may hate them or prefer to comfort suck at the breast (praying I can actually nurse this time).
It's one of those things you can't really plan for, imo.
Bloggin' It
Coming from someone who swore up and down they would never use pacis....well I ate my words really quickly. In general I do not have an issue with them, I just didn't want to be the mom of the kid who is 3 years old with a binky and can't break them of it....so as a result I was anti binky....but we used one, DS was BF and bottle fed too with no issues...and it was gone cold turkey by about 15 months old...so I can't complain.
I do feel that they do serve a purpose, and I do not agree with the BF instructor. Not all babies are crying because they NEED something....some of them just require something to help them soothe and a paci sometimes helps.
Babies do not fit a mold. And, some babies have a stronger urge/desire/need to suck, whether from a breast (for comfort nursing) or from a pacifier.
I don't think that planning pacifier use or non-use is necessary. It's fine to take cues from baby and see what they need/want. The may not necessarily need a pacifier, but it's okay for them to want to suck.
(My little BFing story - my oldest had a very strong desire to suck - I ended up spending most of my day comfort nursing because that is all that would soothe her. By the time I wised up and offered her a paci (about 4 weeks), I was already completely exhausted from BFing/comfort nursing that I was weaning Olivia from the breastfeeding......I should have gave her a soother earlier.....much earlier.)
This. Babies do not fit a mold. And, some babies have a stronger urge/desire/need to suck, whether from a breast (for comfort nursing) or from a pacifier.
I don't think that planning pacifier use or non-use is necessary. It's fine to take cues from baby and see what they need/want. The may not necessarily need a pacifier, but it's okay for them to want to suck.
(My little BFing story - my oldest had a very strong desire to suck - I ended up spending most of my day comfort nursing because that is all that would soothe her. By the time I wised up and offered her a paci (about 4 weeks), I was already completely exhausted from BFing/comfort nursing that I was weaning Olivia from the breastfeeding......I should have gave her a soother earlier.....much earlier.)
I wasn't planning on it, but they gave her one at the hospital because they said she needed to be sucking on it for her hearing test.... and then I just kept giving it to her because it always made her go to sleep immediately- and she was STTN 10+ hours uninterrupted at 2.5 weeks!
But we just took it away and she won't nap and sleeps so much less so now it's kind of a pain that we did it, but we had 19 months of wonderful sleep with it...
It really is a soothing thing and I just figured it was a technique I could control- I could keep it clean and take it away, unlike fingers/thumbs... so we used it. It was always for the crib only though.
oh and I BFed for a year with no issues.
We will be using them until she's 6 months. Then at six months we will move to only nights until she's 1.
i said i wouldn't use one with #1...lol, never say never.
sometimes babies like the comfort, so if they're uncomfortable or overstimulated or whatever, the pacifier will calm them down. when it's 2 am and it's between a paci or your boob, the paci wins.
the LC i saw said that nipple confusion is blown out of proportion and not to worry about it so much. we were able to break the paci habit with no problem.
Anyone who says that babies only cry for a reason has clearly never had a colicky baby. It actually makes me angry to hear people spreading that sort of thing because when you have a colicky baby (especially if it's your first), it is INCREDIBLY challenging just to deal with the crying ALL. THE. TIME. without also having to feel like you're some sort of failure for having a baby that cries and you're unable to comfort. In case you can't tell, DS was colicky and it was really hard. It was made even more difficult by the sort of attitude that you're describing. I just felt like, "He's got to have a reason for crying and I must be a terrible mom for not knowing/being able to figure out why." My advice is to cut yourself some slack: use the paci, don't use the paci, just don't stress about it by some kind of edict before the baby is even here.
ETA: I did give DS a paci and also breastfed him until he was 15 months old - it didn't seem to affect his ability to breastfeed at all. Nor did it affect my supply, for what that's worth.
if it wasnt for them reducing the risk of SIDS, i wouldnt bother with them. i dont think they interfer with BF'ing - i just dont want to have to worry about getting rid of them once DD is a toddler.
im paranoid about SIDS though - so anything that is linked to reducing the risk, i will try.
my BF class instructor just said not to use pacifiers or bottles before 4 weeks while you are establishing BFing
so that's what we'll do - then we'll play it by ear - if LO seems to like to make the sucking motion a lot we'll use one for a bit (although they recommend to get rid of it by 6 monthsish) if all seems well, we won't
Sometimes babies cry because they want to suck on something, and a paci can fit that bill. The babies I know that use them spit them out if they have another need and keep right on crying.
As it happens, DD never took one. We avoided giving her one at first because of establishing BFing (in the beginning even comfort 'nursing' by the baby can help establish supply, although I know a lot of people who used one right off with no problems), and when we did offer, she refused. She's never sucked her fingers/thumb, either. We'll just see how it goes with this one.