That is hilarious! I would never buy them for Brooke, but I'd use 'em if someone bought them for us. Of course, I'd use any diaper someone bought for us. . .
(and I'd probably still put her in shorts to cover the diapers, which would make them pointless)
I think they're ridiculous. I mean a sposie printed to look like cloth? Why not just use cloth in the first place then? And mini daisy dukes for an infant are so if you ask me.
But then again, I am more conservative when it comes to what I think babies and kids should wear. Nothing bothers me more than teenie bopper clothes sized down for babies and toddlers. WTF? Sorta like this:
Um yeah, this is sized for 5T and smaller. Why oh why? Little girls have PLENTY of time when they're older to sport a bikini. Must they start when they are 2 years old? Not to mention the styling of this one is particularly offensive to me with the string triangle top. For a 16 year old? Maybe. But a 6 month old? Uh, no.
I think I'd buy them if they are priced the same as the regular ones, but since he's usually got pants on over the diaper, seems that it would be a waste if it cost more. Then again, maybe during the summer I won't make him wear pants? I don'tknow. Nonetheless, I'm not worried about how stylin' he looks at 6 months old!
not really my style... but I'm the type to cover a diaper no matter what - even if it's just those cotton diaper cover style shorts (got Jack a pair at Carter's).
I saw these on the back page of the newest BRU mailer. When I read "jeans" diapers I thought maybe they were less bulky to wear under jeans or something, but then saw that they *look* like jeans and kind of thought it was a cute idea, as a novelty but since we use cloth all his diapers are different so I never get bored.
I think it's a cute idea. Maybe not jean exactly but would be down to have some sort of cute pattern on the diapers for us sposie users other than a Big Bird! And on a side note about the bikini's for littles... My girls are rockin the 2 pieces now because there is no way in hell they are wearing them when they get older. Our philosophies are opposite Lori. It did take a whole lot of convincing to get Matt to realize this though. I think it's totally cute seeing the littles chubby belly hangin out of a bikini. So they better enjoy it while they can because they're only here for a limited time.
Re: Huggies Jean Diapers
That is hilarious! I would never buy them for Brooke, but I'd use 'em if someone bought them for us. Of course, I'd use any diaper someone bought for us. . .
(and I'd probably still put her in shorts to cover the diapers, which would make them pointless)
CLICK for blog
This.
I think they're ridiculous. I mean a sposie printed to look like cloth? Why not just use cloth in the first place then? And mini daisy dukes for an infant are so
if you ask me.
But then again, I am more conservative when it comes to what I think babies and kids should wear. Nothing bothers me more than teenie bopper clothes sized down for babies and toddlers. WTF? Sorta like this:
Um yeah, this is sized for 5T and smaller. Why oh why? Little girls have PLENTY of time when they're older to sport a bikini. Must they start when they are 2 years old? Not to mention the styling of this one is particularly offensive to me with the string triangle top. For a 16 year old? Maybe. But a 6 month old? Uh, no.
TTC/PG Blog | Mommy Blog
I tend to agree, although it could be worse - they could look like this:
Ummm.....yeah.
Ooh... do they make those in toddler sizes? DD would love a pair! Hahaha...
not really my style... but I'm the type to cover a diaper no matter what - even if it's just those cotton diaper cover style shorts (got Jack a pair at Carter's).
I saw these on the back page of the newest BRU mailer. When I read "jeans" diapers I thought maybe they were less bulky to wear under jeans or something, but then saw that they *look* like jeans and kind of thought it was a cute idea, as a novelty but since we use cloth all his diapers are different so I never get bored.