So I was talking to my parents on the weekend about how I want to do everything as naturally as possible. I want to be in a hospital, in case of major emergencies and what-not, but I want to avoid any kind of drugs and the like.
Then my mom interrupts to tell me that she had to have a caesarean because her frame was too small to handle the birthing process, and that I should get used to the idea of doing it myself because I'm the same size and shape and will probably be forced to do so.
I want to call BS on her because that sounds ridiculous to me...I'm small yes, but 5'1" and 135 lbs isn't exactly minuscule, and I can not imagine being physically incapable of giving birth when I'm perfectly healthy.
Has anyone ever heard of this before? A few people have told me that it's an old attitude of 'the times', and that my mother could have birthed me just fine if she'd had the patience, but my father tells horror stories about how she was in labor for 35 hours and couldn't dilate enough, so now I'm worried. I really really really REALLY don't want to have a c-section (unless, of course, there's a danger to the baby if I don't) if I can manage it.
Re: Has anyone ever heard of this...?
Your mom is right... This can / does happen. I'm not sure how often it happens though. I would talk to your OB about it.
It can happen, but is not very common. Just talk to your OB and make sure you both are comfortable with your birth plan.
This. But it doesn't necessarily mean you'll end up with a c/s. My BF's mom was 5'1" and 100 pounds and had (3) 10lb babies naturally.
As other posters said, it CAN happen, but just because it happened to her doesn't mean it will happen to you. My mom delivered all three of us via c-section because her pelvis just won't accommodate a term baby. But I'm still plenty hopeful for a vaginal birth.
ETA: My mom is 5'7" and has a medium-to-large frame. So I don't think being "petite" tells you much of anything.
~EDD Nov 18, 2017 with my IUI success story~
[spoiler]
My Dr with my first told me all through out my pregnancy that i had a small pelvis and i may end up in a c-section because of this. I tried for all i was worth to get that kid outta my crotch but he wouldn't come down. His head was literally stuck and not coming through my pelvis. He was a 7lbs 14oz baby... so average. My Doc later said she knew all along i was going to have a c-section but did let me try for a vaginal bitrth.
It has nothing to do with your weight or height but your hips! i had a friend who not small by anyone's standard and when she went to deliver the doctors found her pelvic bone was too small to all the head through so she had to have a csection. i think for the most part unless your bones are extremely small they will let you try to deliver natural first because things do stretch etc and if the baby never drops down they will do the csection instead.
i would stay positive and try for the natural birth first.
Yup, it can happen. It happened to me. I'm 5'0 with a small frame & DD did not fit. She & midwife tore me up down there. I had alot of complications after giving birth and was put on bedrest for 2 months. They said that I can't deliver a baby over 7 pounds but I have so much damage down there my doc. wants to be on the safe side and do a C-Section.
Thanks for all the responses and suggestions ladies! I'll keep hoping to go natural (I have much wider hips than my mother, so there's that), but I'll try to be reasonable (I seem to recall my doc having to use an extra small speculum once, which probably isn't a good sign).
My two reasons for wanting to avoid a c-section at all costs are that I'm scared to death (never had surgery before, unless you count removing my wisdom teeth, which isn't exactly very invasive), and not wanting any nasty scars (I'm sure the times have changed, but my mom's is pretty noticeable and not at all nice to look at, so I shudder at the thought). Even so, I'll try to get used to the idea, just in case.
Don't let anyone discourage you from a natural birth if that is what you want. It will be the best experience. I have heard of this before, but I don't believe it is that common. Def talk to you doc about it, but "old timers" mentaility seem to be from a different, less women-independent time.
Go for it girl!
As others have said, it's not your weight or height, it's your pelvis. My aunt is 5' 1" and maybe 100 pounds and delivered 4 babies vaginally.
ETA: and all of her kids were 7-9 pounds at birth.
This. My mom is tiny. She's 5'1" and 100lbs. She had three children naturally. Her frame is tiny, but her pelvis was adequate to birth children.
*** BFP #3 - angel baby at 8w2d - D&C 1.31.14 ***
*** BFP #4 - Chloe Grace, the 'C' to complete our 'A & B' - born Feb 25th, 2015 at 22w2d, lived for 2.5hrs ***
<a href="http://www.thebump.com/?utm_source=ticker&utm_medium=HTML&utm_campaign=tickers" title="Parenting Advice"><img src="http://global.thebump.com/tickers/tt1c7a3f.aspx" alt=" Pregnancy Ticker" border="0" /></a>
I`m built the same (5'1 and 135). My mom had 2 c-sections b/c her "frame was too small". I had a vaginal birth. Everyone is different. If you want a natural vaginal birth GO FOR IT! Just keep options open b/c plans change.
My thoughts on the subject.....
Yes, it does happen, but rarely. A Dr. can't definitively know the size of your baby before it is born. Ultrasound technology isn't that perfect. And, I hear this "diagnosis" happening so early in pregnancy that I doubt that the Dr. really knows the size of the pelvis and whether the baby will fit. I have never heard of someone having an x-ray to determine the size of the pelvis (not in this decade, at least). I think that elective c-sections happen more frequently because of this reason because Drs. prefer to schedule c-sections, for their schedule and for liability reasons. I know plenty of teeny women who have delivered large babies vaginally. I also think that sometimes a baby isn't well positioned, therefore no progress and the mom doesn't dilate, and that mom is told the baby "wouldn't fit" when it wasn't a fit issue, but a positioning issue. If the kid isn't perfectly head down, labor doesn't progress properly.
As far as the incision scar goes, it really is not that bad. Granted, it's not better than no scar, but it is not all that noticable. Mine is covered by my underwear/bathing suit bottoms. No one sees it but my H and myself. It is only about 5 inches across. I only know one person (a Bumpie) who has the vertical incision, and that's because she had another surgery in addition to her C.
Don't be skurred! H&H!
It happened to me. I'm 5'5" and a size 6. I fully dialated to 10 and pushed and pushed and pushed but DD just couldn't fit through my pelvis. After a totaly of 23 hours of labor I had to have a c-section. DD was 8lbs, 7oz.
As for the scar, it's totally not noticable to anyone but DH and doctors. It's in the very top of my hairline and about 4-5 inches across. My underwear and bathing suit bottoms cover it - even my skimpiest undies cover it completely.
My mom was 4'11, 90lbs and delivered me naturally with no problems- I was 9lb.
I would reccommend the book "Pushed" to you. Yes, this does happen, but it is MUCH more rare than you would think. Nowadays, this country is so sue-happy that doctors will often scare you into thinking the baby "wont fit" when it's more that they are just wanting to do a C so that their chances of being sued are MUCH less.
The PP's are right in that it does happen HOWEVER, from what my doc said, usually a woman's height and weight doesn't have much to do with how big of a baby she can push out.
There are large frame women who have a harder time pushing out a 6 pound baby, than a smaller fram woman has pushing out a 9 pound baby. The only way a doctor can really predict how you'll do, is if you have a hip issue or something else that is pre-existing. Otherwise, it's just an educated guess, and it's a wait-and-see. They won't know until D-day.