OK, say your students were given this writing prompt:
Think about one thing you would like to change about school. In several paragraphs, write letter to your principal explaining why it should be changed.
Would you consider this persuasive writing (writing to influence someone) or expository (writing to explain)? I know it has the word "explain" in it, but to me it seems like they are writing to influence the principal to change something, which would make is persuasive. What do you guys think?
I'm kind of freaking out because this is on their state writing test (my 4th graders are struggling through it right now), and we haven't done ANY persuasive writing all year - we aren't supposed to until 5th grade!!! Even my really strong writers are having a hard time thinking of multiple reasons why one thing should be changed. Ugh, I hate watching them suffer through state testing. ![]()
Re: Teachers - I have a question! (NBR)
Here once the test is out for the kids the prompt becomes public domain. We all have to do it on the same day district wide. If I was asking for help for the kids I would totally get fired, but I'm not. Actually I am thinking about complaining about the prompt to... somebody? Still trying to figure out who I would voice my concerns to. I just wanted to make sure I wasn't crazy first. I can see how it's both, but it seems to be more pursuasive than anything else and they just threw the word "explain" in there to make it seem more of an expository.
Seems more persuasive.
I don't like standardized testing. There are so many factors that come into play with it that the results are bound to be varied; especially by varying SES situations. There are also those kids who are smart but simply do not take tests well. The fact that teachers will be "graded" on how well the kids do drives me insane. Not saying that there are no bad teachers, just that all schools don't have the same benefits and therefore should not be graded the same.
Wow...I went off on a little tangent... sorry
No worries, I completely agree! I would get more on board with standardized testing if they gave a test at the beginning of the year, and a follow up at the end of the year. That way you could actually see their growth in a year when I had some influence. I hate that there is a ton of pressure on me, as a 4th grade teacher (here the 4th grade test is a HUGE deal), to have my class on standard. But if they came into my class reading at a 1st grade level, how am I supposed to have them advance 3 years during the 8 months I have some control over them? Ugh, I"m going to get all riled up about this.
However, even my theory that a beginning of the year/end of the year test would be better sucks for a lot of teacher with high turnover rates. I've lost and gained 6 students this year. At my sister's school, she only has 10 of the students that she started with in September. The rest have moved in over the year. At schools in eastern Washington there are huge migratory populations that move in and out throughout the year. How should those kids be tested? Which teacher is held accountable, and how is it made fair?
Cut the Crap - Weight loss journey of a Few Fat Chicks