I know most of you are going to say your parents or DH's parents. But in our case, my mom is in her mid-60s and I don't think she would want to start all over again. And although DH's parents are in their 50s... I would almost think that they would feel the same way - that they wouldn't want to start all over. But I would feel a little better them raising my DD.
So if anything were to happen to both you and DH, who would raise your LO?
Re: If something happened to you and DH, who would raise LO?
My mom will be 62 in September and as of right now would take them. She's actually listed in our trusts as guardian. In a few years, we're not sure. It's not that she wouldn't want to start over, she would raise my kids in an instant if we couldn't, it would be that she feels she would be too old and not in the physical condition to take care of them, as she starts to age. For example, when my DS is 10 she'll be almost 72...what would happen if something happened to her in that time, when my kids are still minors?
My inlaws are about my mom's age...just a year or 2 older. But they are the ones who wouldn't want to "start over." My dad and stepmom live in Florida and I wouldn't even consider them.
Beyond my mom, we're still deciding. I'm an only child and my DH is the 3rd of 4 boys. We think his oldest brother and SIL would be our choice.
UM...WHAT??? That is nutso, I hope he doesn't think he'll be babysitting your LO anytime!
My husband's brother and wife are going to raise the twins if anything happened to us. They are the most similiar to us in many aspects and we know that they will love and raise the twins as well as we could.
DH's brother and SIL would take the two girls. DS would live with my ex husband. We have had the will drawn up since DD 1 was a week old. We also set up a trust for them.
The only problem we have is that they are very conservative Catholic, and we are not.
We are going to have to have a conversation about this....my family all live in Scotland, and his family have health issues. I can not see MIL or SIL being able to care for Ella, not financially, or being able to physically.
Then, if we were to say my sister and her husband, Ella would have to move to Scotland. Not a big problem, because through my British citizenship, she
We are going to have to have a conversation about this....my family all live in Scotland, and his family have health issues. I can not see MIL or SIL being able to care for Ella, not financially, or being able to physically.
Then, if we were to say my sister and her husband, Ella would have to move to Scotland. Not a big problem, because through my British citizenship, she is
We are going to have to have a conversation about this....my family all live in Scotland, and his family have health issues. I can not see MIL or SIL being able to care for Ella, not financially, or being able to physically.
Then, if we were to say my sister and her husband, Ella would have to move to Scotland. Not a big problem, because through my British citizenship, she is automatically a British citizen. I think MIL would fight tooth and nail against it though.
Such a tough decision.
No kidding...it is very sore subject for me. I really hope MIL didn't know that prior to marrying him because that is ridiculous if she did and still went through with it.
We haven't decided for sure yet, but I'm leaning towards my father and my stepmom. My dad is younger than my ILs and my stepmom is 15 years younger than him. They are in better health than my ILs and also in better shape financially.
We've also thought about one of DH's siblings, but we have some differences with them in parenting styles, so not sure about that...plus none of them are in good financial shape.