Ughh. I had this discussion with DH last night and told him rather point blank that IMO, it does not matter the gestational age of the fetus, a loss is a loss and is hard no matter what. He still did not believe me and seems to think it is harder if the gestational age of the fetus is longer. What started this conversation is that a coworker (more like irker) of his just went through a loss at 25 weeks. It occured at the same time we went through our ectopic 2nd loss.
Why do people have to compete over which type of loss is worse? It doesn't matter which, they all suck and hurt and leave a whole in your heart. I am really frustrated that he was doing this. grrrrrrr...
Re: A loss is a loss (DH vent)
BFP #1 - m/c on 12.22.09 @ 8w3d
BFP #2 - d&c on 07.22.10 @11w1d
BFP #3 - DS born on 06.22.11 @41w3d!
BFP #4 - Due 04.24.13
All losses suck and each one is awful and each person's grief is unique. I'm sorry - this isn't a competion.
Agree.
BFP #1 12/28/09 D&C 2/15/10
BFP #2 DS
BFP #3 5/13/12 M/C 6/10/12
BFP #4 8/12/12 M/C 8/18/12
September 2012 - 2.5mg Femara + Ovidrel + TI = BFP #5 Beta #1 - 61 @ 12 dpo, Beta #2 - 183 @ 14 dpo, Beta #3 - 1466 @ 19 dpo
My mom said that to me. Her words were "There was something wrong with the baby, just be glad it happened earlier".
Ok then, thanks mom.
I agree. A loss is a loss. While having a loss later on would hurt my heart longer and greater, I'm still just as broken.
This.
I think you misunderstood. I NEVER said it was a competition. I disagree with DH b/c his comment made it sound like it was a competition.
this was just my blog entry...kind of. I don't know why people insist on competing with every aspect of life, it's frustrating. Why would you want to compete about the loss of a child.
I have had losses early and late, they all hurt. They were different feelings for me, but they both hurt the same.
I totally agree with you!
My thoughts exactly.
BFP # 1 - 12/19/09 EDD 08/27/10 - D&C 1/26/10 @ 9w5d
BFP # 2 - 06/05/10 EDD 02/17/11, DS1 born on 2/14/11
BFP # 3 - 04/10/13 EDD 12/21/13 - D&C 05/15/13 @ 8w4d
BFP # 4 - 07/27/13 EDD 04/08/14 - CP 07/29/13
BFP # 5 - 09/14/13 EDD 05/28/14, DS2 born on 5/22/14
Missed m/c 11.09 | Missed m/c 3.10 | We miss you & love you so.
~ ~ ~
Formerly toddandjulie
I agree 100% too.
My DH kept saying that after our 2nd loss. . . like at least our losses were earlier. . .
But you know, that doesn't make them suck any less. It makes the nature of the loss different, but what I've discovered is that there's a general sentiment that a 20 week loss is different from a 5 week loss is different from a 40 week loss, and I think that's kind of unfair. It's so dismissive of women who have legitimate losses but weren't pregnant "long enough" for the WORLD to see that loss - and the subsequent grief - as legit.
That's like saying to someone "Thank god your child died at 4 instead of 18. That would have really sucked."
My Blog
I agree with you completely.
I agree, though it is a more public pain when it's later. Very few people knew I was Pg because it was still so early, but I can imagine it lingers longer (in public, though not necessarily in your heart) when you were further along because you run into people who knew you were pg and don't know you lost it.
In the end, a loss is a loss and the personal pain of that can't and shouldn't be one-upped.
I agree, a loss is a loss - no matter what stage you're in.
The only thing I see, IMHO, is that for me, I lost my son at 17wks pregnancy and I, at times, find it hard when a family member is telling me about their loss at 7 weeks. I still feel sad that they m/c, but at the same time it's just a different feeling - and I'm sure a person that loses their baby at 25wks can't relate to my loss at 17wks, but the sympathy and sadness is there. (Does that make sense?)
But still - a loss is a loss and it hurts because as soon as you see that indicator line saying "PREGNANT," as a mother you're attached to that little guy/girl in your uterus.
I concur with the consensus here that a loss is a loss and that all suck.
That being said, my loss was at 8w6d. I was a wreck for 2 weeks and then started coming out of the fog. I can't even fathom how it would have handled it at 20or 25 weeks when there was an actual physical child that you can see and hold. I guess because at that point I would have thought I was out of the woods so it would be so much more shocking. While I never anticipated this m/c, I knew the possibility was stronger until I got past 12 weeks.
At the end of the day, it basically comes down to the one thing we all know too well...those that have not experienced this will not ever know the magnitude of how hard this is. It's just not possible to empathize until you have actually been there - don't care if you are the SO, BFF, whatever. I had a lot of people say to me "good thing it happened early" which sucks to hear - there is no "good" in this at all. The only good would be if it had not happened at all!
This exactly. It was such a shock when went into the doctor for a high-risk u/s and found that my water had broken at 15weeks. I thought I was homefree after my 1st tri ended.
Couldn't have said it better.
So it is a competition to you? I am not understanding what your point is.
I could not agree with you more. I cannot tell you how many people tried to comfort me by providing stories of people they knew who were further along than me or the fact they suffered more losses than me. Because of this information according to them I should have been "grateful"!!!! CRAP!
I am sorry that DH is out of touch with reality. He needs a swift kick to the rear.