ok. i keep seeing announcements where babies are born like 3-10 mins apart. this is what i thought the norm was but then when i delivered i have baby A at 10:12PM and don't deliver baby B until 11:59PM. yes, i had a vaginal delivery but i see others who deliver vag and still have little time in between.
i imagine that the length of time was a bad thing, the OB would have made more effort to get B out right? they were all like "he's taking his time making his way down. he's taking advantage of the extra space and taking a nap too" and they all walked out while B made his way down...
just curious but how many vaginal deliveries out there had a bit of a time difference between babies (maybe not as far apart as mine but still)
Re: time between LO's during birth?
this was me exactly! after A i was like how the he!! am i supposed to deliver B when i am sooo tired! B was just chillin and all the docs left but one who told me to try and take a nap. lol so i did take a few like 10 min naps which really helped boost my energy and helped me deliver B.
they didn't break B's bag until like 11:15 or so. he was really just chilling and did take like 2 naps so they were not worried.
regardless, i had two healthy and beautiful babies and thought i was soooo exhausted, i would not have changed a thing! (though at the time, b/c of the length in between, i was begging for a c/s and my epi had totally worn off!)
thanks for the input ladies!