I've always thought this was a bit of a conundrum. Aren't the two sort of mutually exclusive? In order to be truly socially liberal, don't you have to support funding for socially liberal programs? If you're fiscally conservative, by definition you oppose this sort of funding, right? For example, can you really be pro-choice but consistently vote to cut off funding for family planning clinics? I understand that "socially liberal" can refer to some things that have nothing to do with money, like gay marriage, etc., but the majority of the time I think there is an economic tie-in. And, are the only people who profess to be FC/SL the ones who vote republican? Because I don't think I've ever heard someone who votes democrat describe themselves this way. Which isn't necessarily good or bad, just an observation. Thoughts? If anyone is still awake to respond?
Re: Fiscally conservative/ socially liberal. Possible?
I get what you're trying to say, but I disagree. I think there are fiscally conservative ways to be socially liberal
Example: "universal healthcare" does not have to be government-only aka socialized healthcare. There are potentially other ways to reduce healthcare costs and to ensure everyone has access to affordable health plans without resorting to one government health plan. Just my opinion.
So Tasty, So Yummy
DD #1 passed away in January 2011 at 14 days old due to congenital heart disease
DD#2 lost in January 2012 at 23 weeks due to anhydramnios caused by a placental abruption
The fiscally conservative part = low taxes, few governmental programs (churches, charities, communities ideally would assist the poor and those with special needs).
The socially liberal part = the government staying out of moral issues, legalizing "victimless" crimes (drug use, prostitution).