Just curious not trying to be rude or nosy but we have been debating the pros and cons of children closer together rather than spread out. Just curious others thoughts?
I've heard some say I'd like a few crazy years then you get a family able to go and travel rather than start over with a new one just as you get the first able to go.
And I've had a friend say she didn't want to steal attention from each so she wanted them 3-4 yes apart.
To each his own I know.
TIA
Re: Did most plan for 2u2?
No, not really. We did want kids close in age, but we were surprised that I kept getting PG while BFing.......
Honestly, you need to do what you think is right for your family. There are pros and cons to every age difference.
We didn't necessarily plan for 2u2, but we started trying as soon as I got my second pp period (wanted to make sure things were back on track). I didn't get the second pp period until DD was a year old. We got lucky and got pregnant right away. We figured that, like DD, it would take 4-5 months to get pregnant, so if that had been the case we would not have had 2u2. As of #2's due date, they will be 21 months apart.
Yes we wanted 2 under 2.. but maybe 2 or 3 months further apart.. the kids will be 20-21 months apart depending on when #2 arrives...
More of the timing issues was the fact I am a teacher and have to take maternity leave starting in February and not just April like last time.
I am excited to see how close these two are since my closest sibling is 8 years older!
We did. We might be moving out of state next year and wanted to have the baby while we still had help from family and friends here for the newborn stage. Also, we decided it would be better for us to get all the baby stages over at once and move on with life lol. I think it would be super hard completely getting out of diapers and waking up at night and then start all over again. (esp. since DD is still a challenging sleeper)
Plus, I think it will be a lot of fun for them to grow up so close in age
We definitely didn't plan on it, but it was a good surprise. Having gone through infertility with our first, if we had had to sit down and plan when we were going to get back on that roller coaster, I'm not sure we would have done it for a looooooong time.
I had two under one, which has been challenging, but it's also had its positive aspects. They'll be close enough in age that they'll enjoy a lot of the same things at the same time. I've seen families with kids six or seven years apart, and the kids can play together to an extent but not in the way that kids close to the same age do.
It's also nice to know that they'll continue to share experiences as they get older. My sister and I are 22 months apart, and we had friends and teachers and activities in common when we were in school. We also had kids around the same time and that's been a bonding thing for us. I know our youngest sister, who's six years younger than me and four years younger than middle sis, sometimes feels left out because she was too young for some of the things we did in school and she's the only one who isn't married/working/a mother.