In the intros post, a couple of people made references to being "older" or "among the older moms." Or something like that. I know we have some "young moms" in their early 20s on this board, but I was surprised by that "older" statement since most of you in my general age bracket I don't think of as old at all. Especially since being over 30 and starting a family is definitely a growing trend these days. What do you consider being an "older mom?"
Re: How old do you have to be to be an "older mom?"
A couple of years older than I am when I have a baby. I will let you know at that time.
"The House We Built."
A journey of building the dream.
me.
over 40 when having the first child (and now possibly the only child because jon doesn't want to risk my health or a baby's health by having a child in my mid 40s).
I think she got the cuteness for 5 children, so it's all good.
I agree with this. It is what it is... and it doesn't mean "old" it just is "older". I think a lot of it depends on where you grew up too. I grew up in a very small community and with me being at 25, and DH being 27... Most of the people I went to HS with have 1-2 kids. So to me, my view of "older" will be skewed, probably.
Example: My little sister (21), asked me over Christmas when we were having kids, because soon I was going to be an 'old' mom. She grew up in the same town, and is still there - so her perception is even different than mine.
"The House We Built."
A journey of building the dream.
you are SOO not one of the older ones here! If you are, then I'm old too (I'm 32). So quit sayin' that!
I do not really consider myself an "older mom" in the general population kind of way but society does. I am 37, at 35 you are considered advanced maternal age for having a baby.
Saying that I *think* some of the comments might hae meant they are one of the "older moms" on this board? As in one of the moms that has been on this board for a long time? IDK I have not had time to go read all of the intro but that was my thought when I read your post. I could be way off though.
Now I am curious and I am going to have to go search to see who said that.
ETA-OK never mind. By the responses on this thread I can see I was way off. LOL! I need to read the replies before I post!
So I am obiously an "older mom", but I did not put that in my intro. I had my 1st at 33 and 2nd at 36. Honestly though in general I do not feel like an older mom, but I do know I am one of the oldest on this board.
::saluting:: yes ma'am!!
Yup.
In my bag: Canon 60D, 50mm 1.4, Tamron 28-75 2.8, 430exii
Whew! I have 6 months then!
Dx with endo & blocked left tube - TTC #1 for 29 cycles before miracle BFP, #2 - Surprise!!
My TTC/PG blog / Panda Phenomenon Explained
Seriously, though, I'm not sure - I think I'll have a better idea once my kids are in school and I see how old I am in comparison to their classmates' moms.
This.
I'd say 40 or older having a baby is an "older" mom.
I know so many people having babies in their mid to late 30s that I really feel being older and pregnant has become a new norm.
Steph, I'm moving to DC. I would love to be in a place where I don't have to hear 28 year olds worry that if they don't have a kid in the next year they will be "too old." (True Fact: I'm not complaining about anyone on the Bump/Nest. I heard this complaint three times to my face in the last year, and to a 34 year old, it's eyeroll inducing.) DH and I are in a similar situation. We didn't marry until our thirties and we want some alone time together before we start having kids.
That would be me, then. I'm 37 now. I refer to myself as an "older mom" on the boards because I do feel that there are so many nesties younger (and a lot who are much younger, like 10+ yrs) than me. I was 35 when I conceived and delivered DS, and at this rate, I'll be 38 when I deliver my 2nd (but hopefully still 37 when I conceive #2).
Plus, I'm pretty out of shape, so I just FEEL freaking old!
When 3 Became 4