They're not eating the cords....This is a big point of contention with some moms. I could care less what people do but its not like people are forcing their babies to eat lead paint by setting them down in Xmas lights to snap 5 pictures.
No, but the warning on the lights says to wash your hands after handling them. So you're still getting lead on your kid's skin. If you have them in a blanket surrounded by the lights, that's different.
They're not eating the cords....This is a big point of contention with some moms. I could care less what people do but its not like people are forcing their babies to eat lead paint by setting them down in Xmas lights to snap 5 pictures.
^^This. It wouldn't have occured to me but honestly if your child is chewing on a set of plugged in Christmas lights you probably have bigger issues. Just sitting in them for a few minutes isn't going to give them lead poisoning by proximity.
Warning
No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
In the four brands of lights tested, Quantex found surface lead
levels far exceeding the CPSC's recommended children's limit of 15
micrograms.
Wal-Mart brand lights had the highest levels of
surface lead, with levels ranging from 86.6 to 132.7 micrograms. GE
lights showed surface lead levels from 68 to 109.1 micrograms. Sylvania
had surface lead levels from 59 to 70.3 micrograms. Levels of surface
lead in the lights made by Philips ranged from a low of 3.2 -- well
under the 15 microgram limit -- to 107.2 in another sample.
In the four brands of lights tested, Quantex found surface lead
levels far exceeding the CPSC's recommended children's limit of 15
micrograms.
Wal-Mart brand lights had the highest levels of
surface lead, with levels ranging from 86.6 to 132.7 micrograms. GE
lights showed surface lead levels from 68 to 109.1 micrograms. Sylvania
had surface lead levels from 59 to 70.3 micrograms. Levels of surface
lead in the lights made by Philips ranged from a low of 3.2 -- well
under the 15 microgram limit -- to 107.2 in another sample.
Re: One thing that bothers me about the holidays
There's usually a tag right near the plug end that has this warning on it.
Of course, I'm probably the only one that ever reads those tags. :op
oh dear...this is reminding me of a fiasco from when I was pregnant. Jenni darling, do you recall the details?
^^This. It wouldn't have occured to me but honestly if your child is chewing on a set of plugged in Christmas lights you probably have bigger issues. Just sitting in them for a few minutes isn't going to give them lead poisoning by proximity.
Was this a big board war at some point? Hopefully not as contentious as FF/BF and to circ or not to circ.
https://www.cnn.com/2007/HEALTH/12/10/christmas.lights/index.html
We're not talking about a little bit of lead. We're talking significant levels of lead on the surface of the wires.
Oh, hello can of worms... nice to see you open again! :P
When I was going through the tri/parenting boards, this was a huge.freaking.deal. For some people, anyway.
I wouldn't say FF/BF level, but maybe ear piercing/abuse level.
bwahahah! Really?
Now I wonder what the consensus of this particular board would be. Especially since we're into non-toxic toys and household items. hrmmm...
Thanks for posting. I wouldn't take these kinds of pics, but I didn't know this about lights.
It only bothers me if they are served with BPA laden ketchup