Blended Families

Name tattoos...

This post is inspired by a post on the 2nd Tri board. Anyway...

DH and I were talking the other day about how we wouldn't mind getting a tattoo someday. We talked about what random things we might get as well as the idea of getting the same idea (but not the same tattoo).

I thought of us both getting our kids names tattooed on us. This would be something small, but meaningful. Anyway, the thought came up of whether or not I would get SD and SS's names tattooed on me. I don't have a problem with it at all. I absolutely adore them, I help raise them, and I wouldn't want my bio-kids to have any claim over me than them. DH brought up that it might upset BM.

I'm totally on the fence. We are both currently tattoo free, so we could go either way of getting one or not. It also depends on money, size, placement, and if I could find a reputable artist that I totally trust.

So, would you get your SK's name(s) tattooed on you if you decided to get one that used all of your kids names?

(Note: We plan on having one more, so I would either wait until after that or leave space to put future LO's name in there)?

And.....

discuss.?

Re: Name tattoos...

  • I think no...because 2nd marriages (or marriages that come with kids) have a higher failure rate than 1st marriages and if you get a divorce they are no longer your stepkids and you may not see them again. That being said, my DH has my name tattooed on his back so probably I should have responded  "yes". lol
    Stay at Home Mama to 3 Beautiful Children by the miracles of Birth & Adoption
  • Loading the player...
  • WOW! I had the exact same question...so needless to say I don't think I'll be much help to you. I already have one, and DH has two. We would both like to get our kids names also. Our thinking was that even though we don't plan on it or whatever something COULD happen that DH and I did not stay together. Let's be honest, it's always possible. Now even if this did happen, our kids would still be my kids...but ss really would not. Doesn't mean I CARE about him less... but I would also feel bad having "our" kids, but not including ss. It would seem like I don't consider him my kid, when I do. It really is a tough question. I'm interested to see what everyone else has to say...
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I think that there are some things that should only be left up to the actual Mom's and Dads and this might be one of them.  I'm so not the tattoo type  though so I really can't be sure that I completely understand all the dynamics surronding this topic.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • I wouldn?t get a tattoo.  I hate needles.

    That being said, if you feel your step-kids are part of your family, I would vote that you include their names.  Who cares what BM will think?  I?m pretty sure she can?t take you to court over a tattoo on your body.

  • That is a tough one. No one likes to think about this, but if you and your DH were to split up how would you feel about having the kids' names permanently on your body? For me, it would be a painful reminder and I wouldn't want to do it.

    As far as it upsetting the BM, I don't know the BM in your situation, but as a BM it wouldn't bother me.  If my DD's (hopefully) future stepmom wants to get DD's name tattooed on her body she has my full blessing. I would think it was awesome that she felt that strongly about DD and didn't consider her a "step" child. But that is just me.

    I do understand your concern for not wanting to get your biokids name tattooed, but not your stepkids'.  You've got a while to think about it, maybe you can come up with a symbol or something else meaningful to all of you that isn't just the kids' names? Even include the kids in designing it and make it a family project?

  • DH has a tattoo with SD's name and birthdate.  He will be adding to it with our baby's name and bday and we too plan on having one more. 

    DH is trying to talk me into getting a tatto as well.  If I do it I think it would just be with my biological children.  I love my SD but I don't know that I would be comfortable with that, what if something did happen and you and DH split up, It wasn't even something that occured to me honeslty.

  • I don't have their names but I have a tattoo that is a tribal that has each of thier 1st initials in it (although you wouldn't know it if you didn't have it pointed out to you).  I also have a new one drawn up that incorporates something that represents each of them (a sun for the one that I always say is a ball of sunshine type of things).

    I don't particularly are for name tattoos.  I think there are some nicely done ones that are cool but I prefer to pass on those for myself.

    And I am moderately tattooed.  I have more than your average joe.

    As for the success/failure rate of 2nd marriages...my take on it is that I love my skids with all my heart, no differently than I would love them if they were my own flesh and blood.  Even if my marriage should happen to fail, my feelings for those kids would never change and I want to always have something to carry with me that reminds me of them.

    accordingtoabby.com" "From of suffering emerges the strongest souls. The most massive characters are seared with scars." Kahlil Gibran
  • I would skip it all together. That sounds like a slippery area to get into so it's best to avoid all together.

    If you want to do a tattoo how about some symbol and add one for each kid rather then name each specific kid? Like I have a snowflake tattoo and considered adding more snowflakes someday one for each kid. If you like daisies or such you could add a daisy for each kid. That way you're including all of the kids without out right claiming them as yours (stepping on BM's toes).

    Proverbs 12:10 "A righteous man cares for the needs of his animals ChipMonkey 3/19/08 *** Turtle 1/26/10 *** CarBear 10/06/11
  • My only comment about symbolism vs. the name thing is that I am a graphic designer. I love typography, meaning - text is what I would want.?

    I also don't feel that my marriage will fail. Of course that is optimistic, but I really don't think it will. Even if that did happen, to be realistic, it wouldn't change the love that I have felt for those kids since I met them. ?

  • imagethewhitz:

    I wouldn?t get a tattoo.  I hate needles.

    That being said, if you feel your step-kids are part of your family, I would vote that you include their names.  Who cares what BM will think?  I?m pretty sure she can?t take you to court over a tattoo on your body.

    Is it so awful that someone would actually care what a BM thinks? 

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageKarma1969:
    imagethewhitz:

    I wouldn?t get a tattoo.? I hate needles.

    That being said, if you feel your step-kids are part of your family, I would vote that you include their names.? Who cares what BM will think?? I?m pretty sure she can?t take you to court over a tattoo on your body.

    Is it so awful that someone would actually care what a BM thinks??

    If BM wanted to get "I hate ShortyRed" tattooed on her butt, I wouldn't care, but I doubt she will take my thoughts into consideration.?

  • I don't mean in just this circumstance, but it seems like overall lately the general tone of the board is that BM's suck and who cares what they think.  It makes me wonder if that isn't somehow connected to the fact that so many people here are having issues with the BM.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • BTW ShortRed

    You have an adorable baby bump!

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageKarma1969:

    BTW ShortRed

    You have an adorable baby bump!

    THANK YOU!! Big Smile?

  • I would get initials, not the full names...

    I do want a tattoo and am not planning on having any kids-3 SKIDS is plenty, but would not get their names on my body.  I think it depends on your relationship w them.  Is the BM involved in their lives and all.  We share custody, but they mainly live w BM-who, I do believe is a good mom, but there are other things... I don't have major issues with her as I stay clear of her.

    I think there are BM issues just cause that's how it's going to be.  I am sure there are also BF issues here, too, we just hear it more on the other side.

    Do what you feel is right to your body. You are the one who will have it on you...

    And that's my 2 cents.

  • imageLorelaiOctoberBride:

    I would get initials, not the full names...

    I do want a tattoo and am not planning on having any kids-3 SKIDS is plenty, but would not get their names on my body.? I think it depends on your relationship w them.? Is the BM involved in their lives and all.? We share custody, but they mainly live w BM-who, I do believe is a good mom, but there are other things... I don't have major issues with her as I stay clear of her.

    I think there are BM issues just cause that's how it's going to be.? I am sure there are also BF issues here, too, we just hear it more on the other side.

    Do what you feel is right to your body. You are the one who will have it on you...

    And that's my 2 cents.

    She is involved in their lives. She has primary custody of them. I can't say that she would necessarily mind if I put the names on me, but I can't be for certain. I would ask her opinion, but I can't say that I would not get it done just because she minded.?

    ?

  • It sounds like you are a few years away from getting it done, so maybe the kids will have an opinion since they will be older then. 
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • How would you feel if the roles were reversed? If you and DH DID split, he found someone else & you found out YOUR kids name was tattooed on her body. Yeah, gives me the creeps. Don't do it.
  • I'm planning on getting a tattoo with all of our names in a weave.  It's more of a unity design than it would be obvious written names.  DH said he might get something similar someday but "more manly."

    PHOTOS REMOVED

    image

  • DH and I have numerous tattoos and are probably getting several more. I mentioned to DH just the other day that once we have a baby, I'd like to get a tattoo for him or her, something special that symbolizes him/her but maybe not their name, and yes I would want that for SD as well. I did think about what would happen if we separated, but I'll love SD forever even if I'm not with her dad anymore. She is a beautiful child and having something that reminds me of her will make me smile. DH already has a tattoo of me and SD on his sleeve, not our names, but somethng that is special to him about us.
  • I won't ever get a tattoo. It's just not my thing but my husband has two.

    My only advice if you do it...do it in a way that you can always add on if you have more kids.  Two years ago my husband put all four of his kid's names on his arm and it was done in such away that it was in one tattoo and not easy to add onto or change.  He thought he was done having kids. So did I at the time, but our minds changed.

    Our child together will have to go elsewhere.  So just be smart in how you do it if you do it and consider that potential issue....even if you think it may not be an issue.

  • imagej+k:

    I won't ever get a tattoo. It's just not my thing but my husband has two.

    My only advice if you do it...do it in a way that?you can always add on if you have more kids.? Two years ago?my husband?put all four of his kid's names on his arm and it was done in such away that it was in one tattoo and not easy to add onto or change.? He thought he was done having kids. So did I at the time, but our minds changed.

    Our child together will have to go elsewhere.? So just be smart in how you do it if you do it and consider that potential issue....even if you think it may not be an issue.

    Oh yeah, we've definitely thought about this. Excellent point to bring up.?

  • My FI and I got tattoos that I designed for each of us. They are each of our zodiak signs (mine, my DD, his DD and FI). Now that we are expecting, we will add to it by having his also but will wait until we make sure we are done with children...
  • My opinion: guys at any age look fine with a little ink, girls with tattoos at any age look cheap.  Don't do it.
    Stay at home mom to a house of boys: two amazing stepsons, 12 and 9, and our 4 year old.
  • Yeah, I think it's a bad idea for the same reason you would not get your DHs name...assuming you would not.  And with SKs, there is more likelihood that they will one day hate you - I am not saying it is likely but more common than bio-kids and even if your bio-kid hated you there would be no regret but there would be with a SK.  Hopefully the relationship will last forever but if you and DH ever split that would also end the relationship with SKs.  That said, I only have bio-kids with DH but I will tell you that I might burn someone at the stakes if they put my kids name on their body because they were their SM...and God-forbid DH and I ever split up, I would hope he found someone that would love my kids but not tattoo their names!  And lastly, if you are worried that it would hurt your SKs feelings to be left out, then do not tatoo your kids names either...I personally would do it but my SD was 11 when I met her so it is a little different and we currently have no relationship after I raised her for years, oh, and I do not want a tattoo, lol.  That said, you can always choose something less obvious like their zodiac signs or something.
    Jen - Mom to two December 12 babies Nathaniel 12/12/06 and Addison 12/12/08
  • imageLittlejen22:
    Yeah, I think it's a bad idea for the same reason you would not get your DHs name...assuming you would not.  And with SKs, there is more likelihood that they will one day hate you - I am not saying it is likely but more common than bio-kids and even if your bio-kid hated you there would be no regret but there would be with a SK.  Hopefully the relationship will last forever but if you and DH ever split that would also end the relationship with SKs.  That said, I only have bio-kids with DH but I will tell you that I might burn someone at the stakes if they put my kids name on their body because they were their SM...and God-forbid DH and I ever split up, I would hope he found someone that would love my kids but not tattoo their names!  And lastly, if you are worried that it would hurt your SKs feelings to be left out, then do not tatoo your kids names either...I personally would do it but my SD was 11 when I met her so it is a little different and we currently have no relationship after I raised her for years, oh, and I do not want a tattoo, lol.  That said, you can always choose something less obvious like their zodiac signs or something.

    FI did this with his zodiac sign and his kids.  They think it's pretty cool that he did that and they each know which is theirs. I have an angel for each of mine and again my kids both dig them! That being said, as much as I love my soon to be SKs, I don't know that I would get a tattoo for them.  Not that I don't adore them but it just seems weird to me.  FI talked about getting my kids added after we get married, but I'm opposed...it just doesn't feel right. But to each their own!!

  • Yeah, I would leave that up to DH to do. I do have a very small tattoo that you cant see unless I'm naked, so I don't mind them but I wouldn't do it. Again, I always try to put myself in BM's shoes for stuff like this and if the tables were turned, I would NOT be happy about some woman putting my kids names on her body. I'm the only one who gets that right cause I carry the scars (c-section scar & stretched v ajay jay).

    If BM were not in the picture, I would still get the approval from the children and if they weren't old enough, I'd wait.

    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • No way. Never even crossed my mind. They are not "mine" and if I was the BM I would be pretty pissed that the SM put my kids names inked forever on their body. JMHO
  • Okay - I was on the fence about this one.  I have only one tatoo and it's in a very private area.  I did contemplate getting the Gemini sign (twin sign for my twins) but don't really think I ever will.  That being said and thinking of both sides, as a mother I don't like the idea of another woman having my kids names on her body.  As a stepmother, although I have a fairly decent relationship with my SS have never felt inclined to be tied to him in that manner.
  • I would never do a name on my body and I have 2 tattoos.  That is just my personal preferance though.  I love the symbolism idea though.

     

  • I have the whole side of my calf done.  It is a section of Van Gogh's "irises" and I have my DD's names above and below it.  In my honest opinion, I would be pissed beyond belief if my stbx h's fiance ever got my DDs' names tattooed on her.  While she may be a part of their lives she is not and will not be their mother.  My stbx has our DDs names tattooed on him though.  My eldest is across his upper chest at his collar bone and my youngest's is across the outside of his lower arm.  They are both pretty big tattoos.  If for some reason the other BP was not involved however, I think it would be a little more appropriate but would still be cautious.
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • Hmm.

    Well, DH and I both have several tattoos, all coverable by clothing if need be. Although, I will say skip the hip tattoos, as one that I have looks kinda intersting with my baby bump, and I'm a little concerned about how it will look after. :P Also, I would never get DH's name as I think it's bad luck, and I've already had to have one cover up done from a previous relationship.

    That said, I already have a tattoo designed for after DS is born. It will be SD's handprint a the age she is now, with DS's baby handprint, with their names and birthdays. I've actually already mentioned it to BM and she doesnt have a problem with it, although I can't say for sure if it would stop me if she did.

    SD will always be a part of my life, no matter what happens to DH and I. I have been raising her with her bio parents since she was a toddler. I attend all her school functions and am involved with every aspect of her life. I have cleaned poopy panties, vomit, and bed wetting. I have gotten up in the middle of the night for fevers and nightmares. I have watched her grow and learn and thrive. I can tell you right now, if DH and I were to split I would spend every dime I have to at least establish visitation.

    The dad in Clueless said it perfectly, "You divorce wives (husbands), not children." :) 

  • imagegosse1km:

    Hmm.

    Well, DH and I both have several tattoos, all coverable by clothing if need be. Although, I will say skip the hip tattoos, as one that I have looks kinda intersting with my baby bump, and I'm a little concerned about how it will look after. :P Also, I would never get DH's name as I think it's bad luck, and I've already had to have one cover up done from a previous relationship.

    That said, I already have a tattoo designed for after DS is born. It will be SD's handprint a the age she is now, with DS's baby handprint, with their names and birthdays. I've actually already mentioned it to BM and she doesnt have a problem with it, although I can't say for sure if it would stop me if she did.

    SD will always be a part of my life, no matter what happens to DH and I. I have been raising her with her bio parents since she was a toddler. I attend all her school functions and am involved with every aspect of her life. I have cleaned poopy panties, vomit, and bed wetting. I have gotten up in the middle of the night for fevers and nightmares. I have watched her grow and learn and thrive. I can tell you right now, if DH and I were to split I would spend every dime?I have to at least establish visitation.

    The dad in Clueless said it perfectly, "You divorce wives (husbands), not children." :)?

    I could have written this myself - aside from us already having tattoos. Not sure about placement just yet (it won't be done for a while) but it would be able to be covered easily by clothing. I really like your idea for the tat!?

    ?

  • Thanks! Seeing as how it's unlikely we will be neighbors or something IRL, feel free to borrow it and make it your own :) lol

    But like I said, if you plan on having more kids, stay away from the hips, lol.

  • Coming into this waaaaay late. Here is what we are doing:

    DH has his son's name tattooed around one wrist. Our LO will be tattooed around his other. DH also has several tattoos with black and red stars, and my tattoo has black stars in it... I am planning on getting a tattoo with our last initial (M) in a cool font in black, with red stars playing into it. One red star for each child. And yes, SS will be represented. But since we aren't using names, only my family will know what the stars represent.

     

    Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker Baby Birthday Ticker Ticker
  • I just think that this is creepy when the kids are older and you are old and you have thier names on you. SK's names or your kids names. I think it would be super weird for me if either of my parents had my name tatooed on them. Actually, just thinking about that made me LOL!
    Warning No formatter is installed for the format bbhtml
  • imageJ&A2008:
    My opinion: guys at any age look fine with a little ink, girls with tattoos at any age look cheap.  Don't do it.

    Phew, we are officially over that streak of thinking alike. Now me and my cheap@$$ can sleep soundly tonight.

    Proverbs 12:10 "A righteous man cares for the needs of his animals ChipMonkey 3/19/08 *** Turtle 1/26/10 *** CarBear 10/06/11
  • LOL

    Sorry you've been losing sleep MRSHK.  Glad I could help you out with my "no tats on girls" policy.  I'll be strictly enforcing it when it comes time for the boys to start dating.  Wink

    Stay at home mom to a house of boys: two amazing stepsons, 12 and 9, and our 4 year old.
This discussion has been closed.
Choose Another Board
Search Boards
"
"